Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Change blindness studies show that when someone's view of a person is occluded for a second or two, he or she may not realize that a new person has taken the place of the original one, even as the conversation continues.
“Studies show that, when someone's view of a person is occluded for a second or two, he or she may not realize that a new person has taken the place of the original one, even as the conversation continues (Simons and Levine 1998).”
From Mindfulness: Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins, and multiple applications at the intersection of science and dharma (2011) · cites this paper as Simons and Levine 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- ARNHEIM, R. (1966). Film as art. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1933)
- BRIDGEMAN, B., & MAYER, M. (1983). Failure to integrate visual infor- mation from successive fixations. Bulletin ofthe Psychonomic Soci- ety, 21, 285-286.
- GRIMES, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across sac- cades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception: Vol. 2. Vancouv;r studies in cognitive science (pp. 89-1 10). New York: Oxford University Press.
- HOCHBERG, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & 1. P.Thomas (Eds.), Handbook ofperception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 22.21-22.64). New York: Wiley.
- JUDD, C. M., & PARK, B. (1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal ofPersonality & Social Psychology, 54, 778-788.
- LEVIN, D. T (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.
- LEVIN, D. T, & SIMONS, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to at- tended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4,501-506.
- LINVILLE, P. W, FISCHER, G. W, & SALOVEY, P. (1989). Perceived dis- tributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal ofPersonality & Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
- LOFTUS, E. E (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- MCCONKIE, G. W., & CURRIE, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across sac- CHANGE DETECTION 649 cades while viewing complex pictures. Journal ofExperimental Psy- chology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 563-581.
- RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1992). Eye movements and scene per- ception. Canadian Journal ofPsychology, 46, 342-376.
- ROTHBART, M., & JOHN,O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behav- ioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup con- tact. Journal ofSocial Issues, 41, 81-104.
- TARR, M. J., & AGINSKY, V.(1996, July). From objects to scenes: Spec- ulations on similarities and differences. Paper presented at the Scene Recognition Workshop, Max-Planck-Institut fiir Biologische Kyber- netik, Tiibingen.
- TREISMAN, A (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Bad- deley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 5-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779 · see citing works
Rensink, R. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01520-5 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Williams, J. M. G., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564811 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
The ‘Real-World Approach’ and Its Problems: A Critique of the Term Ecological Validity
Holleman, G. A., Hooge, I. T. C., Kemner, C., & Hessels, R. S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00721 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Attentional processes and meditation
Hodgins, H. S., & Adair, K. C. (2010) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.04.002 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision
Noe, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/135062800394702 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes?
Nightingale, S. J., Wade, K. A., & Watson, D. G. (2017) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-017-0067-2 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Fletcher‐Watson, S., Leekam, S. R., Turner, M. A., & Moxon, L. (2006) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712606x114057 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Irvine, E. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9273-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Levy, N. (2021) · Bad Beliefs · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0005 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Kent State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Simons, Daniel J.
- Levin, Daniel T.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 644-649
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2087540179
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- change blindness, change detection, real-world interaction, social group membership, visual attention, visual representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review