Cited by 47Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Do people with autistic spectrum disorder show normal selection for attention? Evidence from change blindness

Open access
Fletcher‐Watson, S., Leekam, S. R., Turner, M. A., Moxon, L.·2006·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

People in the general population are typically very poor at detecting changes in pictures of complex scenes. The degree of this 'change blindness', however, varies with the content of the scene: when an object is semantically important or contextually inappropriate, people may be more effective at detecting changes. Two experiments investigated change blindness in people with autism, who are known from previous research to be efficient in detecting features yet poor at processing stimuli for meaning and context. The first experiment measured the effect of semantic information while the second investigated the role of context in directing attention. In each task, participants detected the dissimilarity between pairs of images. Both groups showed a main effect of image type in both experimental tasks, showing that their attention was directed to semantically meaningful and contextually inappropriate items. However, the autistic group also showed a greater difficulty detecting changes to semantically marginal items in the first experiment. Conclusions point to a normal selection of items for attention in people with autism spectrum disorders, although this may be combined with difficulty switching or disengaging attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000712606x114057

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fletcher-Watson et al. (2006) reported no differences in performance between adults with autism and typical adults in a change-detection task.

    “However, Fletcher-Watson, Leekam, Turner, and Moxon (2006) reported no differences in performance between adults with autism and typical adults in a change-detection task.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Fletcher-Watson et al. (2006)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher‐Watson, S., Leekam, S. R., Turner, M. A., & Moxon, L.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Fletcher‐Watson, S.
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
537-554
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2108573190
Cited by
47
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, change blindness, selective attention, semantic information, attentional shift, scene change detection, visual attention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reference Values, Semantics, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review