Cited by 74Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

One-trial associative memory: comparison of food-storing and nonstoring species of birds

Open access
Clayton, Nicky S., Krebs, John R.·1994·Animal Learning & Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03209155

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training animals to explicitly encode and report information in an anticipated memory test may result in the application of non-episodic mechanisms to solve these tasks.

    “That said, training animals to explicitly encode and report information in an anticipated memory test, as is required for what–where–when memory experiments, may result in the application of non-episodic mechanisms to solve these tasks [74,79–84].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [84]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Macphail, E. M. (1982). Brain and intelligence in vertrebrates. Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  2. O'Boyle, V. J., Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (in press). Effects of excitotoxic amygdalo-hippocampal lesions visual recognition in rhesus monkeys. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts.
  3. Rice, H. N. (1992). Food caching, simple association and spatial mem- ory in the blackcapped chickadee. Unpublished master's thesis, Uni- versity of Western Ontario.
  4. Sandi, C., Rose, S. P. R., & Patterson, T. A. (1992), Unilateral hippo- campal lesions prevent recall of a passive avoidance task. Neuro- science Letters, 141, 255-258.
  5. Shettleworth, S. J., Krebs, J. R., Healy, S. D., & Thomas, C. M. (1990). Spatial memory of food storing tits: Comparisons of mem- ory in storing and non-storing tasks. Journal of Comparative Psy- chology, 104, 71-81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clayton, N. S., & Krebs, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Animal Learning & Behavior
Published
1994-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
366-372
ISSN
  • 0090-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5830
OpenAlex
W2031633256
Cited by
74
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Animal Learning & Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Royal Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
food storage, spatial memory, memory discrimination, marsh tit, blue tit, jays, jackdaw, birds, event memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review