Cited by 142EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyECG Monitoring and Analysis

Dealing with artifacts: The EOG contamination of the event-related brain potential

Open access
Gratton, Gabriele·1998·Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03209415

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eye movements generate most power in low frequencies.

    “as eye movements generate most power in such low frequencies [Gratton, 1998].”
  • A high-pass filter above 4 Hz should make it less probable that either the networks or FBCSP would use class-discriminative eye movement artifacts to decode the behavior classes.

    “We included the 4–fend‐Hz dataset as the highpass filter should make it less probable that either the networks or FBCSP would use class‐discriminative eye movement artifacts to decode the behavior classes, as eye movements generate most power in such low frequencies [Gratton, 1998].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. BERG, P. (1989). Comments on EOG correction methods. Journal of Psychophysiology, 3, 41-44.
  2. GRATTON, G., & COLES, M. G. H. (1989). Generalization and evaluation of eye-movement correction procedures. Journal of Psychophysiol- ogy,3,14-16.
  3. JERVIS, B. w., IFEACHOR, E. C., & COELHO, M. (1989). The removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG. Journal ofPsychophysiology, 3, 16-20.
  4. MOCKS, J., GASSER, T, & SROKA, L. (1989). Approaches to correcting EOG artifacts. Journal ofPsychophysiology, 3, 21-26.
  5. QUILTER, P. M., MCGILLIVRAY, B. B., & WADBROOK, D. G. (1977). The removal of eye movement artefact from the EEG signals using cor- relation techniques. Random Signal Analysis, IEEE Conference Pub- lication, 159, 93-100.
  6. VAN DEN BERG-LENSSEN, M. M. C., & BRUNIA, C. H. M. (1989). Cor- rection of ocular artifacts in EEG using an autoregressive model to describe the EEG. Journal ofPsychophysiology, 3, 26-29.
  7. VAN DRIEL, G., WOESTENBURG, J. C, & VAN BLOKLAND-VOGELESANG, A. W. (1989). Frequency-domain methods: A solution for the prob- lems of EOG-EEG contamination in ERPs. Journal ofPsychophysi- ology, 3, 29-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gratton, G.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Gratton, Gabriele
Venue
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
Published
1998-03
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
44-53
ISSN
  • 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5970
OpenAlex
W2038016568
Cited by
142
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
ocular artifacts, electrooculogram, eye movements, blinking, event-related potentials, EEG, artifact rejection, EEG artifact removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review