The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes
Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x · Cited by 2,338
Familiarity and visual change detection
Pashler, H. (1988) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03210419 · Cited by 1,021
Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.
Potter, M. C. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.2.5.509 · Cited by 1,008
Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity
Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0005 · Cited by 947
Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy
Spelke, E. S., Kestenbaum, R., Simons, D. J., & Wein, D. (1995) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1995.tb00669.x · Cited by 455
Self-citation(1996) · Cited by 394
In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail
Simons, D. J. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00378.x · Cited by 379
Self-citationVisual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.
McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.22.3.563 · Cited by 363
Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?
McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202990 · Cited by 348
Is the Richness of Our Visual World an Illusion? Transsaccadic Memory for Complex Scenes
Blackmore, S. J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., & Trościanko, T. (1995) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p241075 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p281059 · Cited by 3,181
Self-citationA taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 · Cited by 1,472
Change blindness: Past, present, and future
Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006 · Cited by 1,153
Self-citationThe seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
Schacter, D. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.3.182 · Cited by 1,133
Rensink, R. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125 · Cited by 850
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 501-506
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2119474986
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03214339
- The paper
- Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03214339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
