The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rat pups are potent reinforcers to the maternal animal: Effects of experience, parity, hormones, and dopamine function
Open accessAbstract
These experiments were designed to determine whether the parity difference in robustness of a maternal experience reflects a parity difference in the reinforcing value of pups and factors affecting pup reinforcement. Postpartum and virgin animals were exposed for 15, 30, or 60 min to a novel environment (either a horizontally or vertically striped box) in the presence or absence of pups (or food stimuli) over a 2-, 4-, or 8-day period and then tested for their box preference in a two-choice conditioned place preference paradigm. Postpartum animals preferred the pup-associated box to the alternative box; nulliparous animals did not. The reverse pattern was found when food, rather than pups, was paired with the distinctive environment. However, if nulliparous animals were induced to become maternal either by induction procedures or by hormonal manipulation, they also preferred the pup-associated box. The effect was most robust when animals were stimulated to be maternal by hormones. Finally, pup reinforcement shares properties with other types of reinforcers in being dependent on the functional integrity of the dopamine system. Postpartum animals treated with cis( Z )-flupentixol, a dopamine antagonist, do not develop a conditioned place preference when pups are the reinforcing stimulus. Taken together, these experiments show that pups are potent reinforcers to the maternal animal, regardless of how animals become maternal, but that the hormones of parturition may augment these effects. They show further that pup reinforcement, like food or drug reinforcement, is dopamine dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Morgan, H. D., Fleming, A. S., & Stern, J. M. (1992) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(92)90178-5 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Cited by
Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling.
McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., & Olausson, H. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.001 · Cited by 1,112
depue, R. A., & morrone-strupinsky, J. V. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000063 · Cited by 958
The origins of altruism in offspring care.
Preston, S. D. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0031755 · Cited by 368
Evaluating the rewarding nature of social interactions in laboratory animals
Trezza, V., Campolongo, P., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.007 · Cited by 258
Fleming, A. S., Kraemer, G. W., Gonzalez, A., Lovic, V., Rees, S., & Melo, A. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00793-1 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, A. S., Korsmit, M., & Deller, M.
- Venue
- Psychobiology
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-53
- ISSN
- 0889-6313 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W782321475
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.