The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recognition memory for infant faces: An analog of the other-race effect
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adults show worse recognition of previously seen infants based on their faces.
“adults showing worse recognition of previously seen infants based on their faces (Chance, Goldstein & Andersen, 1986)”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Chance, Goldstein & Andersen, 1986
Infant faces appear more alike than adult faces for adult viewers.
“infant faces appear more alike than adult faces for adult viewers (based on subjective ratings; Chance, Goldstein & Andersen, 1986)”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Chance, Goldstein & Andersen, 1986
In typical perceivers, adult face memory performance is reduced for young children's faces.
“in typical perceivers, evidence suggests that adult face memory performance is reduced for young children’s faces (Anastasi & Rhodes, 2005; Chance et al., 1986; Rhodes & Anastasi, 2012)”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Chance et al., 1986
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Chance, J. E., Goldstein, A. G., & McBride, L. (1975). Differential experience and recognition memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 243–253. · DOI
- Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of differential recognition of own- and other-race faces. Journal of Psychology, 112, 29–37. · DOI
- Charness, N. (1979). Components of skill in bridge. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 1–50. · DOI
- Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
- Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. S. Seigler (Ed.), Children’s memory (pp. 73-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 393–396. · DOI · Paper page
- Ericsson, K. A., & Chase, W. G. (1982). Exceptional memory. American Scientist, 70, 607–615.
- Feinman, S., & Entwhistle, D. R. (1976). Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces. Child Development, 47, 506–510. · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G. (1979a). Facial feature variation: Anthropometric data n. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 191–193. · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G. (1979b). Race-related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 187–190. · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1976). Measuring psychological similarity of faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 407–408. · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1978). Judging face similarity in own and other races. Journal of Psychology, 98, 185–193. · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1979). Do foreign faces really look alike? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 111–113. · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47–59 · DOI
- Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1985). Effects of training on Japanese face recognition: Reduction of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 211–214. · DOI
- Kenney, M. (1979, July). Right name, wrong baby. Parents, pp. 62-65.
- Malpass, R. S. (1981). Training in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 271-285). London: Academic Press.
- Peeck, J., & Zwarts, J. (1983). Recognition memory for pictures of birds in relation to bird-watching skill. American Journal of Psychology, 96, 553–556. · DOI
- Shepherd, J. (1981). Social factors in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 55-79). London: Academic Press.
- Shepherd, J., Deregowski, K., & Ellis, H. (1974). A cross-cultural study of recognition memory for faces. International Journal of Psychology, 9, 205–212. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls
Bate, S., Bennetts, R., Murray, E., & Portch, E. (2020) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669520944420 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Chance, J. E., Goldstein, A. G., & Andersen, B.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-260
- ISSN
- 0090-5054
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
