The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The engram found? Role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of nictitating membrane and eyelid responses
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solomon, P. R., & Moore, J. W. (1975) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077183 · Cited by 473
Cited by
The Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Thompson, R. F. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3738519 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationMemory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future
Josselyn, S. A., & Tonegawa, S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw4325 · Cited by 1,087
Is the cerebellum a Smith predictor?
Miall, R. C., Weir, D. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Stein, J. F. (1993) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1993.9942050 · Cited by 1,071
Cerebellum: Essential Involvement in the Classically Conditioned Eyelid Response
McCormick, D. A., & Thompson, R. F. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6701513 · Cited by 910
Self-citationLeDoux, J. E. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400335111 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Mccormick, D. A., Lavond, D. G., Clark, G. A., Kettner, R. E., Rising, C. E., & Thompson, R. F.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 103-105
- ISSN
- 0090-5054 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140308616
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
