The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python
Peirce, J. W. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 · Cited by 4,603
Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature
Repp, B. H. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03206433 · Cited by 1,462
Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX
Danckert, J. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00077-5 · Cited by 540
Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search
Wolfe, J. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00024-4 · Cited by 276
Vision Egg: An Open-Source Library for Realtime Visual Stimulus Generation
Straw, A. D. (2008) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/neuro.11.004.2008 · Cited by 265
Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform
Stevens, M., Lammertyn, J., Verbruggen, F., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192779 · Cited by 204
PyEPL: A cross-platform experiment-programming library
Geller, A. S., Schleifer, I. K., Sederberg, P. B., Jacobs, J., & Kahana, M. J. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192990 · Cited by 76
Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance Volume Xix
Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2001) · Cited by 75
Cited by
Grassini, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628 · Cited by 330
Xie, W., Campbell, S., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2008868117 · Cited by 109
Imagine, and you will find – Lack of attentional guidance through visual imagery in aphantasics
Monzel, M., Keidel, K., & Reuter, M. (2021) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02307-z · Cited by 61
Grassini, S., & Ree, A. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2023 · doi:10.1145/3605655.3605669 · Cited by 50
“For both studies, the surveys were developed using Psyktoolkit [50, 51].”
MethodThe effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive performance—a randomised controlled study
Sandkühler, J. F., Kersting, X., Faust, A., Königs, E. K., Altman, G., Ettinger, U., Lux, S., Philipsen, A., Müller, H., & Brauner, J. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-03146-5 · Cited by 29
“Block-tapping was originally performed with physical blocks and later on the website Psytoolkit [41, 42] as part of remote testing during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoet, G.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1096-1104
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2023701920
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/brm.42.4.1096
- The paper
- Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.42.4.1096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
