The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006 · Cited by 2,226
Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106138 · Cited by 1,990
The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2805 · Cited by 1,680
That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb
Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097011 · Cited by 1,348
How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy
Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006 · Cited by 1,257
Metadata
- Authors
- Danckert, J.
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-116
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2926576851
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00077-5
- The paper
- Danckert, J. (2003). Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00077-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.