Cited by 111Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Distinguishing multi-voxel patterns and mean activation: Why, how, and what does it tell us?

Coutanche, Marc N.·2013·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The introduction of multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) community has brought a deeper appreciation for the diverse forms of information that can be present within fMRI activity. The conclusions drawn from MVPA investigations are frequently influenced by both the ability to decode information from multi-voxel patterns and mean activation levels. In practice, MVPA studies vary widely in why and how they test for differing overall response levels. In this article, I examine the place of univariate information in MVPA investigations. I first discuss the variety of interpretations given to finding univariate response differences. I go on to discuss some of the analysis approaches used to investigate and compare univariate and multivariate sources of information, which can illuminate their respective contributions. It will be important for the MVPA and general fMRI community to continue to discuss and debate these important issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13415-013-0186-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mean-normalization (z-scoring) of voxels ensured that any task discrimination observed was driven by differences in spatial pattern of activity, and not by differences in mean activation differences between tasks.

    “This ensured that any task discrimination observed was driven by differences in spatial pattern of activity, and not by differences in mean activation differences between tasks (Coutanche 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coutanche, M. N.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Coutanche, Marc N.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2013-07-16
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
667-673
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W1966149299
Cited by
111
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
multi-voxel pattern analysis, multivariate decoding
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Automated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review