Cited by 18Action Observation and SynchronizationVisual perception and processing mechanismsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

A perceiver’s own abilities influence perception, even when observing others

Open access
Witt, Jessica K., South, Susan C., Sugovic, Mila·2014·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Perceptual judgments of objects, such as judgments of their size, distance, and speed, are influenced by the perceiver's ability to act on these objects. For example, objects that are easier to block appear to be moving slower than objects that are more difficult to block. These effects are known as action-specific effects. Recent research has found similar patterns when a person observes someone else act: When the other person's task is more difficult, objects look farther away and faster to the observer, whereas when the other person's task is easier, the objects look closer and slower to the observer. These previous findings that another person's ability penetrates into perceptual judgments challenge the idea that action-specific effects are specific to the perceiver's own abilities. However, in the present study, we show that the apparent effects of another person's ability on the observer's judgments are actually due to the observer's own abilities as if he or she was in the other person's situation. This implicates a type of self-projection motor simulation mechanism. The results also preserve the critical idea that action-specific effects are perceiver specific and, consequently, that they could be adaptive for planning future actions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-013-0505-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kwon, T., & Kim, T. (2012). The effect of skill level on perceptual judgment. European Journal of Scientific Research, 91, 184-187.
  2. Proffitt, D.R., & Linkenauger, S. A. (2013). Perception viewed as a phe- notypic expression. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Tutorials in action science (pp. 171-197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Witt, J. K. (2011b). Tool use influences perceived shape and parallelism: Indirect measures of perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1148-1156.

Authors
Witt, J. K., South, S. C., & Sugovic, M.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Witt, Jessica K.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2013-09-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
384-389
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W1965771313
Cited by
18
References
29
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
perception-action coupling, motor simulation, self-projection, apparent motion, apparent distance, apparent size, action planning
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Social Perception, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review