Cited by 53Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Transdiagnostic computations of uncertainty: towards a new lens on intolerance of uncertainty

Open access
Sandhu, Timothy R., Xiao, Bowen, Lawson, Rebecca P.·2023·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

People radically differ in how they cope with uncertainty. Clinical researchers describe a dispositional characteristic known as "intolerance of uncertainty", a tendency to find uncertainty aversive, reported to be elevated across psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions. Concurrently, recent research in computational psychiatry has leveraged theoretical work to characterise individual differences in uncertainty processing. Under this framework, differences in how people estimate different forms of uncertainty can contribute to mental health difficulties. In this review, we briefly outline the concept of intolerance of uncertainty within its clinical context, and we argue that the mechanisms underlying this construct may be further elucidated through modelling how individuals make inferences about uncertainty. We will review the evidence linking psychopathology to different computationally specified forms of uncertainty and consider how these findings might suggest distinct mechanistic routes towards intolerance of uncertainty. We also discuss the implications of this computational approach for behavioural and pharmacological interventions, as well as the importance of different cognitive domains and subjective experiences in studying uncertainty processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105123

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intolerance of uncertainty is characteristic of a large cluster of mental disorders, especially those with predominant internalizing symptoms: anxiety, fears, depression, obsession, eating disorders, self-harm, narrow range of interests, and painful indecision.

    “Нетерпимость к неопределенности характерна для большого кластера психических расстройств, особенно тех, при которых преобладают симптомы интернализации: тревога, страхи, депрессия, обсессия, нарушения пищевого поведения, аутоагрессия, узкий круг интересов и болезненная нерешительность (Sandhu et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandhu, T. R., Xiao, B., & Lawson, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
148
Pages
105123
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323926355
Cited by
51
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (206691/Z/17/Z)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, uncertainty processing, computational psychiatry, individual differences, psychopathology, uncertainty estimation, mechanistic model, behavioral interventions, pharmacological interventions, subjective experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review