The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing
Open accessAbstract
Null-hypothesis significance testing remains the standard inferential tool in cognitive science despite its serious disadvantages. Primary among these is the fact that the resulting probability value does not tell the researcher what he or she usually wants to know: How probable is a hypothesis, given the obtained data? Inspired by developments presented by Wagenmakers (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804, 2007), I provide a tutorial on a Bayesian model selection approach that requires only a simple transformation of sum-of-squares values generated by the standard analysis of variance. This approach generates a graded level of evidence regarding which model (e.g., effect absent [null hypothesis] vs. effect present [alternative hypothesis]) is more strongly supported by the data. This method also obviates admonitions never to speak of accepting the null hypothesis. An Excel worksheet for computing the Bayesian analysis is provided as supplemental material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“JZS Bayes factor ANOVAs with default prior scales [49–52] revealed support for the null hypothesis regarding main and interaction effects for all three cognitive outcomes.”
From Dual N-back working memory training in healthy adults: A randomized comparison to processing speed training. (2016) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Bayesian model selection in social research
Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271063 · Cited by 6,823
ANew Look at the Statistical Model Identification
AKAlKE, H. (2011) · Cited by 4,177
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 754
Nakayama, M., Ida, K., & Lupker, S. J. (2015) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728915000462 · Cited by 58
Huber‐Huber, C., Buonocore, A., Dimigen, O., Hickey, C., & Melcher, D. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.059 · Cited by 46
Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study
Zanolie, K., & Pecher, D. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00987 · Cited by 54
Object Shape and Orientation Do Not Routinely Influence Performance During Language Processing
Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613490746 · Cited by 56
When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.
Hughes, R. W., & Marsh, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000736 · Cited by 49
When attention is intact in adults with ADHD
Roberts, M. S., Ashinoff, B. K., Castellanos, F. X., & Carrasco, M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1407-4 · Cited by 51
Does Tonal Information Affect the Early Stages of Visual-Word Processing in Thai?
Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.813054 · Cited by 47
Change Detection: Training and Transfer
Gaspar, J. G., Neider, M. B., Simons, D. J., McCarley, J. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067781 · Cited by 51
Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention
Yokoyama, T., Sakai, H., Noguchi, Y., & Kita, S. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03858 · Cited by 47
Canales‐Johnson, A., Billig, A. J., Olivares, F., Gonzalez, A., García, M. D. C., Silva, W., Vaucheret, E., Ciraolo, C. A., Mikulan, E., Ibáñez, A. M., et al. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa058 · Cited by 49
Is that me in the mirror? Depersonalisation modulates tactile mirroring mechanisms
Adler, J., Schabinger, N., Michal, M., Beutel, M. E., & Gillmeister, H. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.009 · Cited by 44
Split-Second Trustworthiness Detection From Faces in an Economic Game
Neys, W. D., Hopfensitz, A., & Bonnefon, J. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000367 · Cited by 47
The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
Vachon, F., Marsh, J. E., & Labonté, K. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000714 · Cited by 46
Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints
Crepaldi, D., Hemsworth, L., Davis, C. J., & Rastle, K. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713 · Cited by 49
Beste, C., Mückschel, M., Rosales, R. L., Domingo, A., Lee, L., Ng, A. R., Klein, C., & Münchau, A. M. (2017) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26895 · Cited by 44
Computing Bayes factors to measure evidence from experiments: An extension of the BIC approximation
Faulkenberry, T. J. (2018) · Biometrical Letters · doi:10.2478/bile-2018-0003 · Cited by 46
Donovan, I., Shen, A., Tortarolo, C., Barbot, A., & Carrasco, M. (2020) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.20.4.18 · Cited by 45
Soltanlou, M., Pixner, S., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01062 · Cited by 40
Branigan, H. P., Tosi, A., & Gillespie‐Smith, K. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000272 · Cited by 49
Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta
Watts, A. T. M., Bachman, M. D., & Bernat, E. M. (2017) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.054 · Cited by 48
When A+B < A: Cognitive Bias in Experts’ Judgment of Environmental Impact
Holmgren, M., Kabanshi, A., Marsh, J. E., & Sörqvist, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00823 · Cited by 49
The maintenance of cross-domain associations in the episodic buffer.
Langerock, N., Vergauwe, E., & Barrouillet, P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0035783 · Cited by 43
How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
Marsh, J. E., Campbell, T. A., Vachon, F., Taylor, P. J., & Hughes, R. W. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w · Cited by 43
Voluntary attention improves performance similarly around the visual field
Purokayastha, S., Roberts, M. S., & Carrasco, M. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02316-y · Cited by 43
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention
Fernández, A., Hanning, N. M., & Carrasco, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2219635120 · Cited by 39
Makin, A. D. J., Rampone, G., Morris, A., & Bertamini, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01485 · Cited by 42
Mundy, I. R., & Carroll, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.662341 · Cited by 43
Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
Carmel, T., & Lamy, D. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000118 · Cited by 41
Memory for emotional words: The role of semantic relatedness, encoding task and affective valence
Ferré, P., Fraga, I., Comesaña, M., & Sánchez‐Casas, R. (2014) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.982515 · Cited by 41
Perea, M., Vergara‐Martínez, M., & Gómez, P. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.007 · Cited by 41
Decision-making and the framing effect in a foreign and native language
Winskel, H., Ratitamkul, T., Brambley, V., Nagarachinda, T., & Tiencharoen, S. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1139583 · Cited by 43
Neural dynamics of stimulus-response representations during inhibitory control
Prochnow, A., Bluschke, A., Weißbach, A., Münchau, A. M., Roessner, V., Mückschel, M., & Beste, C. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00163.2021 · Cited by 43
The interference effect in arithmetic fact solving: An fMRI study
Visscher, A. D., Berens, S. C., Keidel, J. L., Noël, M., & Bird, C. M. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.063 · Cited by 40
No differences in dual-task costs between forced- and free-choice tasks
Janczyk, M., Nolden, S., & Jolicœur, P. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0580-6 · Cited by 43
Klein, E., Willmes, K., Bieck, S. M., Bloechle, J., & Moeller, K. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.017 · Cited by 35
The (ir)relevance of unemployment for labour market policy attitudes and welfare state attitudes
Wehl, N. (2018) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12274 · Cited by 42
Ocular drift along the mental number line
Myachykov, A., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0731-4 · Cited by 45
The role of semantic representations in verbal working memory.
Loaiza, V. M., & Camos, V. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000475 · Cited by 39
The central locus of self-prioritisation
Janczyk, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818778970 · Cited by 41
Experimental Manipulations of Personal Control do Not Increase Illusory Pattern Perception
van Elk, M., & Lodder, P. (2018) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.155 · Cited by 45
Chuan-Peng, H., Kong, X., Er, I.-J., Al, E., & Peng, K. (2018) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2018.00951 · Cited by 44
Era, V., Aglioti, S. M., Mancusi, C., & Candidi, M. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1090-8 · Cited by 37
Bluschke, A., Friedrich, J., Schreiter, M. L., Roessner, V., & Beste, C. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.027 · Cited by 59
The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues
Gressmann, M., & Janczyk, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00244 · Cited by 43
Visual experience influences the interactions between fingers and numbers
Crollen, V., Noël, M., Seron, X., Mahau, P., Leporé, F., & Collignon, O. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.002 · Cited by 39
Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112 · Cited by 46
MichałBiałek, & Neys, W. D. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · Cited by 38
Brydges, C. R., & Barceló, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00060 · Cited by 40
Capraro, V., Sippel, J., Zhao, B., Hornischer, L., Savary, M., Terzopoulou, Z., Faucher, P., & Griffioen, S. F. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205066 · Cited by 37
Stojanov, A., Bering, J. M., & Halberstadt, J. B. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237771 · Cited by 42
The grammatical class effect is separable from the concreteness effect in language learning
Martin, K. I., & Tokowicz, N. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728919000233 · Cited by 39
Goghari, V. M., & Lawlor‐Savage, L. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00039 · Cited by 42
Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect
Shichel, I., & Tzelgov, J. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.007 · Cited by 42
The role of tone and segmental information in visual-word recognition in Thai
Winskel, H., Ratitamkul, T., & Charoensit, A. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1181095 · Cited by 36
de Koning, B. B., Wassenburg, S. I., Bos, L. T., & van der Schoot, M. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2017.1281283 · Cited by 39
Exploring dyslexics’ phonological deficit II: Phonological grammar
Szenkovits, G., Darma, Q., Darcy, I., & Ramus, F. (2016) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723716648841 · Cited by 37
Foster, J. K., Albrecht, M. A., Savage, G. R., Lautenschlager, N. T., Ellis, K. A., Maruff, P. T., Szoeke, C. E. I., Taddei, K., Martins, R. N., Masters, C. L., et al. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt127 · Cited by 38
Combined effects of form- and meaning-based predictability on perceived clarity of speech.
Signoret, C., Johnsrude, I. S., Classon, E., & Rudner, M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000442 · Cited by 37
Self-Perceived Benefits of Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults
Goghari, V. M., & Lawlor‐Savage, L. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00112 · Cited by 38
Residential mobility reduces ingroup favouritism in prosocial behaviour
Li, W., Li, L. M. W., & Li, M. (2018) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12338 · Cited by 35
Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
Kätsyri, J., de Gelder, B., & de Borst, A. W. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116216 · Cited by 37
Sommerauer, G., Graß, K.-H., Grabner, R. H., & Vogel, S. E. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107405 · Cited by 35
Ninaus, M., Kiili, K. J. M., Wood, G. M. D. O., Moeller, K., & Kober, S. E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2020.3031644 · Cited by 35
The other modality: Auditory stimuli in language switching
Declerck, M., Stephan, D. N., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1026265 · Cited by 35
Priming of abstract letter representations may be universal: The case of Arabic
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Mallouh, R. A. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0260-8 · Cited by 34
The influences of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories
Numbers, K. T., Meade, M. L., & Perga, V. A. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0443-9 · Cited by 34
Buetti, S., & Lleras, A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000213 · Cited by 36
Subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts interact at several processing levels
Stock, A., Friedrich, J., & Beste, C. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.027 · Cited by 35
Marois, A., Marsh, J. E., & Vachon, F. (2019) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.002 · Cited by 33
Pscherer, C., Bluschke, A., Prochnow, A., Eggert, E., Mückschel, M., & Beste, C. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25178 · Cited by 33
Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D., & Meade, M. L. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0299-4 · Cited by 34
Analyzing paleomagnetic data: To anchor or not to anchor?
Heslop, D., & Roberts, A. P. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/2016jb013387 · Cited by 35
Maxwell, N. P., & Huff, M. J. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09301-2 · Cited by 36
Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect.
Sellaro, R., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Liepelt, R., & Hommel, B. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0038548 · Cited by 35
Corno, G., Serino, S., Cipresso, P., Baños, R., & Riva, G. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0340 · Cited by 37
Hierarchical Brain Network for Face and Voice Integration of Emotion Expression
Davies-Thompson, J., Elli, G. V., Rezk, M., Benetti, S., van Ackeren, M. J., & Collignon, O. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy240 · Cited by 36
Ability for Voice Recognition Is a Marker for Dyslexia in Children
Perea, M., Jiménez, M., Suárez‐Coalla, P., Fernández, N., Viña, C. F., & Cuetos, F. (2014) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000265 · Cited by 33
Differences between Spatial and Visual Mental Representations
Sima, J. F., Schultheis, H., & Barkowsky, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00240 · Cited by 32
Assessing a novel polymer-wick based electrode for EEG neurophysiological research
Pasion, R., Paiva, T. O., Pedrosa, P., Gaspar, H., Vasconcelos, B., Martins, A. C., Amaral, M. H., Nóbrega, J. M., Páscoa, R. N. M. J., Fonseca, C., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.04.009 · Cited by 32
On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account
Forrin, N. D., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9 · Cited by 32
Decomposing item-method directed forgetting of emotional pictures: Equivalent costs and no benefits
Taylor, T. L., Quinlan, C. K., & Vullings, K. C. H. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0751-y · Cited by 39
False Discovery in A/B Testing
Berman, R., & den Bulte, C. V. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4207 · Cited by 36
The role of attention in preschoolers’ working memory
Bertrand, R., & Camos, V. (2014) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.10.002 · Cited by 35
It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., Wang, R., & Branigan, H. P. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.017 · Cited by 34
Effects of motor congruence on visual working memory
Quak, M., Pecher, D., & Zeelenberg, R. (2014) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0654-y · Cited by 33
Residual tests in the analysis of planned contrasts: Problems and solutions.
Richter, M. M. (2015) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000044 · Cited by 35
Bayesian data analysis for newcomersPreprint
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nqfr5 · Cited by 40
Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing
Forrin, N. D., Jonker, T. R., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.798417 · Cited by 38
On magnitudes in memory: An internal clock account of space–time interaction
Cai, Z. G., & Connell, L. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.003 · Cited by 33
Astrometric Reduction of the Wide-Field Images
Akhmetov, V. S., Khlamov, S. V., Khramtsov, V., & Dmytrenko, A. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33695-0_58 · Cited by 31
Degrauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., Willems, R., & Schriefers, H. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00802 · Cited by 29
Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
Biderman, D., Biderman, N., Zivony, A., & Lamy, D. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000422 · Cited by 31
Chmielewski, W. X., Bluschke, A., Bodmer, B., Wolff, N., Roessner, V., & Beste, C. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100623 · Cited by 34
Gaspar, J. G., Neider, M. B., Crowell, J. A., Lutz, A., Kaczmarski, H., & Kramer, A. F. (2013) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720813499930 · Cited by 33
Khlamov, S. V., Savanevych, V., Briukhovetskyi, O., & Орышич, С. С. (2016) · Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies · doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65999 · Cited by 30
Does social environment influence learning ability in a family-living lizard?
Riley, J. L., Noble, D. W. A., Byrne, R. W., & Whiting, M. J. (2016) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1068-0 · Cited by 30
Vogel, S. E., Koren, N. A., Falb, S., Haselwander, M., Spradley, A., Schadenbauer, P., Tanzmeister, S., & Grabner, R. H. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.12.001 · Cited by 33
Tea: A High-level Language and Runtime System for Automating Statistical Analysis
Jun, E., Daum, M., Roesch, J., Chasins, S. E., Berger, E., Just, R., & Reinecke, K. (2019) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3332165.3347940 · Cited by 48
Ghin, F., Stock, A., & Beste, C. (2022) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.07.004 · Cited by 34
Clark, C. M., Lawlor‐Savage, L., & Goghari, V. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177707 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Masson, M. E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Masson, Michael E. J.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 679-690
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2151069696
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 34.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- Bayesian model selection, null hypothesis significance testing, Bayes factor, analysis of variance, sums of squares, evidence rating, null hypothesis, effect size
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Probability, Research Design, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review