The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing
Open accessAbstract
Null-hypothesis significance testing remains the standard inferential tool in cognitive science despite its serious disadvantages. Primary among these is the fact that the resulting probability value does not tell the researcher what he or she usually wants to know: How probable is a hypothesis, given the obtained data? Inspired by developments presented by Wagenmakers (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804, 2007), I provide a tutorial on a Bayesian model selection approach that requires only a simple transformation of sum-of-squares values generated by the standard analysis of variance. This approach generates a graded level of evidence regarding which model (e.g., effect absent [null hypothesis] vs. effect present [alternative hypothesis]) is more strongly supported by the data. This method also obviates admonitions never to speak of accepting the null hypothesis. An Excel worksheet for computing the Bayesian analysis is provided as supplemental material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“JZS Bayes factor ANOVAs with default prior scales [49–52] revealed support for the null hypothesis regarding main and interaction effects for all three cognitive outcomes.”
From Dual N-back working memory training in healthy adults: A randomized comparison to processing speed training. (2016) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Bayesian model selection in social research
Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271063 · Cited by 6,823
ANew Look at the Statistical Model Identification
AKAlKE, H. (2011) · Cited by 4,177
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications
Wagenmakers, E., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., et al. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 · Cited by 1,767
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors
Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014) · The Journal of Problem Solving · doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1167 · Cited by 1,101
Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?
Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0039400 · Cited by 1,102
Steenbergen, L., Sellaro, R., van Hemert, S., Bosch, J. A., & Colzato, L. S. (2015) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.003 · Cited by 671
“To calculate Bayesian probabilities we used the method proposed by Wagenmakers (2007) and Masson (2011).”
MethodMorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis
Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0 · Cited by 701
A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations
Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x · Cited by 536
Bayesian data analysis for newcomers
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1 · Cited by 439
An Introduction to Bayesian Hypothesis Testing for Management Research
Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314560412 · Cited by 370
Replication in Psychological Science
Lindsay, D. S. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615616374 · Cited by 296
Designing awe in virtual reality: an experimental study
Chirico, A., Ferrise, F., Cordella, L., & Gaggioli, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02351 · Cited by 276
A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP
van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J. B., Marsman, M., Draws, T., van Kesteren, E., Derks, K., Dablander, F., Gronau, Q. F., Kucharský, Š., Gupta, A. R. K. N., et al. (2020) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.3917/anpsy1.201.0073 · Cited by 267
Investigating learning outcomes and subjective experiences in 360-degree videos
Rupp, M. A., Odette, K. L., Kozachuk, J. R., Michaelis, J. R., Smither, J. A.-A., & McConnell, D. S. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.015 · Cited by 251
A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., Lissa, C. J. V., & Gu, X. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000201 · Cited by 256
Revisiting Mental Simulation in Language Comprehension: Six Replication Attempts
Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051382 · Cited by 234
Sörqvist, P., Hedblom, D., Holmgren, M., Haga, A., Langeborg, L., Nöstl, A., & Kågström, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080719 · Cited by 178
The brain’s functional network architecture reveals human motives
Hein, G., Morishima, Y., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Fehr, E. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac7992 · Cited by 165
Dissociation between mental fatigue and motivational state during prolonged mental activity
Monika, G., Jacob, B., Olivier, E., & Zénon, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00176 · Cited by 177
Animates are better remembered than inanimates: further evidence from word and picture stimuli
Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaïska, A. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0368-8 · Cited by 153
Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.
Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0031172 · Cited by 154
The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures
Białek, M., & Pennycook, G. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0963-x · Cited by 168
Dealing with the evaluation of supervised classification algorithms
Santafé, G., Inza, I., & Lozano, J. A. (2015) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9433-y · Cited by 144
Does Confidence Use a Common Currency Across Two Visual Tasks?
de Gardelle, V., & Mamassian, P. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614528956 · Cited by 131
HajiHosseini, A., & Holroyd, C. B. (2013) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12040 · Cited by 140
Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
Bayarri, M. J., Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. M. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.12.007 · Cited by 126
Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions.
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Logan, G. D., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0030543 · Cited by 130
Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy
Bird, A. (2018) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axy051 · Cited by 126
Shared striatal activity in decisions to satisfy curiosity and hunger at the risk of electric shocks
Lau, J. K. L., Ozono, H., Kuratomi, K., Komiya, A., & Murayama, K. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0848-3 · Cited by 131
Białek, M., & Neys, W. D. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005696 · Cited by 122
Cipora, K., & Nuerk, H. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.772215 · Cited by 106
Testing adaptive toolbox models: A Bayesian hierarchical approach.
Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030777 · Cited by 115
Categorical encoding of color in the brain
Bird, C. M., Berens, S. C., Horner, A. J., & Franklin, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315275111 · Cited by 104
A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASPPreprint
van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J. B., Marsman, M., Draws, T., van Kesteren, E., Derks, K., Dablander, F., Gronau, Q. F., Kucharský, Š., Raj, A., et al. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/spreb · Cited by 107
The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall
Camos, V., & Portrat, S. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0772-5 · Cited by 102
How to design the fair experimental classifier evaluation
Stąpor, K., Ksieniewicz, P., García, S., & Woźniak, M. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107219 · Cited by 104
Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Batchelder, W. H., & Wagenmakers, E. (2013) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9374-9 · Cited by 108
The Doubting System 1: Evidence for automatic substitution sensitivity
Johnson, E. D. M., Tubau, E., & Neys, W. D. (2015) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.008 · Cited by 105
Buetti, S., Cronin, D. A., Madison, A., Wang, Z., & Lleras, A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000163 · Cited by 98
Human Memory Retrieval and Inhibitory Control in the Brain: Beyond Correlational Evidence
Penolazzi, B., Stramaccia, D. F., Braga, M., Mondini, S., & Galfano, G. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0349-14.2014 · Cited by 96
Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C. A., & Dix, A. J. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173715 · Cited by 109
Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.839560 · Cited by 100
Action video games do not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks.
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0036923 · Cited by 98
Distinct roles of forward and backward alpha-band waves in spatial visual attention
Alamia, A., Terral, L., D’ambra, M. R., & VanRullen, R. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.85035 · Cited by 92
Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations
Cipora, K., Hohol, M., Nuerk, H., Willmes, K., Brożek, B., Kucharzyk, B., & Nȩcka, E. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6 · Cited by 88
Eitel, A., Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3004 · Cited by 85
“Unfocus” on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory
Steenbergen, L., Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., Lindenberger, U., Kühn, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2015) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4391-9 · Cited by 88
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.
Gilbert, R. A., Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G., & Rodd, J. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000532 · Cited by 87
Richter, M. (2016) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000295 · Cited by 84
Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection
van Elk, M., Rutjens, B. T., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2014) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2014.933444 · Cited by 89
Timm, J., Schönwiesner, M., Schröger, E., & SanMiguel, I. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.018 · Cited by 93
Cipora, K., Soltanlou, M., Reips, U., & Nuerk, H. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01213-5 · Cited by 83
More attentional focusing through binaural beats: evidence from the global–local task
Colzato, L. S., Barone, H., Sellaro, R., & Hommel, B. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0727-0 · Cited by 90
Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: The attentional boost effect in implicit memory.
Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., & Rossi‐Arnaud, C. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0030907 · Cited by 85
Evaluating visual and auditory contributions to the cognitive restoration effect
Emfield, A. G., & Neider, M. B. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00548 · Cited by 80
Pertermann, M., Bluschke, A., Roessner, V., & Beste, C. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.03.011 · Cited by 84
Alilović, J., Timmermans, B., Reteig, L. C., van Gaal, S., & Slagter, H. A. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz038 · Cited by 79
Dopamine Manipulation Affects Response Vigor Independently of Opportunity Cost
Zénon, A., Devesse, S., & Olivier, E. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4467-15.2016 · Cited by 79
Gillespie, A., Glăveanu, V. P., & Laurent, C. D. S. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009031066 · Cited by 120
Objective Bayesian Two Sample Hypothesis Testing for Online Controlled Experiments
Deng, A. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2740908.2742563 · Cited by 77
Branigan, H. P., & Messenger, K. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.004 · Cited by 86
Lawlor-Savage, L., & Goghari, V. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151817 · Cited by 74
Seli, P., Ralph, B. C. W., Risko, E. F., Schooler, J. W., Schacter, D. L., & Smilek, D. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1249-0 · Cited by 75
Temporal attention improves perception similarly at foveal and parafoveal locations
Fernández, A., Denison, R. N., & Carrasco, M. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.1.12 · Cited by 74
Sex differences in psychiatric comorbidity and clinical presentation in youths with conduct disorder
Konrad, K., Kohls, G., Baumann, S., Bernhard, A., Martinelli, A., Ackermann, K., Smaragdi, A., González-Madruga, K., Wells, A. E., Rogers, J. C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13428 · Cited by 73
Opitz, A., Beste, C., & Stock, A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116524 · Cited by 73
Bayesian alternatives to null-hypothesis significance testing for repeated-measures designs
Nathoo, F. S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2015) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.03.003 · Cited by 75
Self-citationTemporal Dynamics Underlying the Modulation of Social Status on Social Attention
Dalmaso, M., Galfano, G., Coricelli, C., & Castelli, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093139 · Cited by 67
When decision heuristics and science collide
Yu, E. C., Sprenger, A. M., Thomas, R. P., & Dougherty, M. R. P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0495-z · Cited by 74
Hayward, D. A., Voorhies, W. I., Morris, J. L., Capozzi, F., & Ristic, J. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/cep0000117 · Cited by 74
Haddara, N., & Rahnev, D. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211032887 · Cited by 82
Huff, M. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0031338 · Cited by 73
Effects of speech on proofreading: Can task-engagement manipulations shield against distraction?
Halin, N., Marsh, J. E., Haga, A., Holmgren, M., & Sörqvist, P. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000002 · Cited by 67
Pupil-Linked Arousal Responds to Unconscious Surprisal
Alamia, A., VanRullen, R., Pasqualotto, E., Mouraux, A., & Zénon, A. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3010-18.2019 · Cited by 75
Adelhöfer, N., & Beste, C. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117052 · Cited by 76
Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials.
Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0028960 · Cited by 64
Stenzel, A., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., & Liepelt, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00595 · Cited by 67
Petruo, V. A., Bodmer, B., Bluschke, A., Münchau, A. M., Roessner, V., & Beste, C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58269-z · Cited by 62
Buetti, S., & Lleras, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00337 · Cited by 64
The influence of math anxiety on symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing
Dietrich, J. F., Huber, S., Moeller, K., & Klein, E. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01621 · Cited by 67
Kätsyri, J., de Gelder, B., & Takala, T. (2019) · Perception · doi:10.1177/0301006619869134 · Cited by 59
Preferential processing of emotionally and self-relevant stimuli persists in unconscious N2 sleep
Blume, C., del Giudice, R., Lechinger, J., Wisłowska, M., Heib, D. P. J., Hoedlmoser, K., & Schabus, M. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.02.004 · Cited by 62
The 'Gateway Belief' Illusion: Reanalyzing the Results of a Scientific-consensus Messaging Study
Kahan, D. M. (2016) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.16050203 · Cited by 64
Chmielewski, W. X., Mückschel, M., & Beste, C. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23974 · Cited by 61
Pscherer, C., Mückschel, M., Summerer, L., Bluschke, A., & Beste, C. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24699 · Cited by 57
Which Phish Is on the Hook? Phishing Vulnerability for Older Versus Younger Adults
Sarno, D. M., Lewis, J., Bohil, C. J., & Neider, M. B. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819855570 · Cited by 59
Human cerebellum and corticocerebellar connections involved in emotional memory enhancement
Fastenrath, M., Spalek, K., Coynel, D., Loos, E., Milnik, A., Egli, T., Schicktanz, N., Geissmann, L., Roozendaal, B., Papassotiropoulos, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2204900119 · Cited by 57
On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects.
Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0026748 · Cited by 58
Self-citationNo role for motor affordances in visual working memory.
Pecher, D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0028642 · Cited by 61
Dalmaso, M., Galfano, G., Tarqui, L., Forti, B., & Castelli, L. (2013) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0033518 · Cited by 57
Seeking advice: A sampling approach to advice taking
Hütter, M., & Ache, F. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000382x · Cited by 57
Dopamine Modulates the Efficiency of Sensory Evidence Accumulation During Perceptual Decision Making
Beste, C., Adelhöfer, N., Gohil, K., Passow, S., Roessner, V., & Li, S. (2018) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyy019 · Cited by 56
Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658409 · Cited by 59
Biased visuospatial perception in complex regional pain syndrome
Filbrich, L., Alamia, A., Verfaille, C., Berquin, A., Barbier, O., Libouton, X., Fraselle, V., Mouraux, D., & Legrain, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10077-8 · Cited by 54
Eating to stop: Tyrosine supplementation enhances inhibitory control but not response execution
Colzato, L. S., Jongkees, B. J., Sellaro, R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Hommel, B. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.027 · Cited by 52
Re-reconsidering the role of temporal order in spoken word recognition
Gregg, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., & Connine, C. M. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819849512 · Cited by 52
The system neurophysiological basis of backward inhibition
Zhang, R., Stock, A., Fischer, R., & Beste, C. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1186-0 · Cited by 53
Equivalent statistics and data interpretation
Francis, G. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0812-3 · Cited by 54
Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning
Fernández, A., Okun, S., & Carrasco, M. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0892-21.2021 · Cited by 51
Spatial Transposition Gradients in Visual Working Memory
Rerko, L., Oberauer, K., & Lin, H.-Y. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.789543 · Cited by 47
Soltanlou, M., Artemenko, C., Ehlis, A., Huber, S., Fallgatter, A. J., Dresler, T., & Nuerk, H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20007-x · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Masson, M. E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Masson, Michael E. J.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 679-690
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2151069696
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 34.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- Bayesian model selection, null hypothesis significance testing, Bayes factor, analysis of variance, sums of squares, evidence rating, null hypothesis, effect size
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Probability, Research Design, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review