Using the speeded word fragment completion task to examine semantic priming
Open accessAbstract
The present research investigates semantic priming with an adapted version of the word fragment completion task. In this task, which we refer to as the speeded word fragment completion task, participants need to complete words such as lett_ce (lettuce), from which one letter was omitted, as quickly as possible. This paradigm has some interesting qualities in comparison with the traditionally used lexical decision task. That is, it requires no pseudowords, it is more engaging for participants, and most importantly, it allows for a more fine-grained investigation of semantic activation. In two studies, we found that words were completed faster when the preceding trial comprised a semantically related fragment such as tom_to (tomato) than when it comprised an unrelated fragment such as guit_r (guitar). A third experiment involved a lexical decision task, to compare both paradigms. The results showed that the magnitude of the priming effect was similar, but item-level priming effects were inconsistent over tasks. Crucially, the speeded word fragment completion task obtained strong priming effects for highly frequent, central words, such as work, money, and warm, whereas the lexical decision task did not. In a final experiment featuring only short, highly frequent words, the lexical decision task failed to find a priming effect, whereas the fragment completion task did obtain a robust effect. Taken together, these results suggest that the speeded word fragment completion task may…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heyman and colleagues created a task using stimuli with only one blank space, where stimuli have only one correct completion and the missing letter is always a vowel.
“Building on this general principle, Heyman and colleagues created a task using stimuli with only one blank space, where stimuli have only one correct completion and the missing letter is always a vowel [75].”
From Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Janzen Ulbricht, N. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280543 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Building on this general principle, Heyman and colleagues created a task using stimuli with only one blank space, where stimuli have only one correct completion and the missing letter is always a vowel [75].”
Method
- Authors
- Heyman, T., De Deyne, S., Hutchison, K. A., & Storms, G.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Montana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Heyman, Tom
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2014-06-19
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 580-606
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W1974852267
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- semantic priming, lexical decision, semantic activation, word frequency, word fragment completion
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Semantics, Task Performance and Analysis, Time and Motion Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review