Spontaneous facial expression in unscripted social interactions can be measured automatically
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Methods to assess individual facial actions have potential to shed light on important behavioral phenomena ranging from emotion and social interaction to psychological disorders and health. However, manual coding of such actions is labor intensive and requires extensive training. To date, establishing reliable automated coding of unscripted facial actions has been a daunting challenge impeding development of psychological theories and applications requiring facial expression assessment. It is therefore essential that automated coding systems be developed with enough precision and robustness to ease the burden of manual coding in challenging data involving variation in participant gender, ethnicity, head pose, speech, and occlusion. We report a major advance in automated coding of spontaneous facial actions during an unscripted social interaction involving three strangers. For each participant (n = 80, 47 % women, 15 % Nonwhite), 25 facial action units (AUs) were manually coded from video using the Facial Action Coding System. Twelve AUs occurred more than 3 % of the time and were processed using automated FACS coding. Automated coding showed very strong reliability for the proportion of time that each AU occurred (mean intraclass correlation = 0.89), and the more stringent criterion of frame-by-frame reliability was moderate to strong (mean Matthew's correlation = 0.61). With few exceptions, differences in AU detection related to gender, ethnicity, pose, and average pixel intensity were small. Fewer than 6 % of frames could be coded manually but not automatically. These findings suggest automated FACS coding has progressed sufficiently to be applied to observational research in emotion and related areas of study.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pixel intensity and skin color were relatively benign sources of error in action unit detection in three-person social interactions.
“Pixel intensity and skin color, by contrast, were relatively benign.”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [261]
In an analysis of errors in action unit detection in three-person social interactions, head yaw greater than 20 degrees was a prime source of error.
“Not surprisingly, in an analysis of errors in AU detection in three-person social interactions, [261] found that head yaw greater than 20 degrees was a prime source of error.”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [261]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Recognizing action units for facial expression analysis
Tian, Y.-I., Kanade, T., & Cohn, J. F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908962 · Cited by 1,745 · see citing works
Self-citationSigns of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame.
Keltner, D. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.441 · Cited by 718 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Session-level reliability for AUs related to brow actions and smile controls, which counteract the upward pull of the zygomatic major (Ambadar et al., 2009; Keltner, 1995), were only somewhat lower.”
Prkachin, K. M., & Solomon, P. E. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.010 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Nonverbal social withdrawal in depression: Evidence from manual and automatic analyses
Girard, J. M., Cohn, J. F., Mahoor, M. H., Mavadati, S. M., Hammal, Z., & Rosenwald, D. P. (2014) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2013.12.007 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomatic coding of facial expressions displayed during posed and genuine pain
Littlewort, G. C., Bartlett, M. S., & Lee, K. (2009) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.12.010 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Girard, J. M., Cohn, J. F., Jeni, L. A., Sayette, M. A., & De la Torre, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2014-12-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1136-1147
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- PMC
- PMC4461567
- OpenAlex
- W2034714139
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 12.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA015773, R01AA015773)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH096951, R01MH096951)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- facial action units, spontaneous facial expressions, FaceReader, inter-rater reliability, head pose variation, occlusion, emotion measurement
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review