Cited by 216Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Automatic coding of facial expressions displayed during posed and genuine pain

Littlewort, Gwen C., Bartlett, Marian Stewart, Lee, Kang·2009·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2008.12.010

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Littlewort, G. C., Bartlett, M. S., & Lee, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Littlewort, Gwen C.
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
1797-1803
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005733474
Cited by
216
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, pain expression, cold pressor pain, facial action units, facial action coding system, emotion recognition, deception detection, subject-independent classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review