The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dangers and uses of cross-correlation in analyzing time series in perception, performance, movement, and neuroscience: The importance of constructing transfer function autoregressive models
Open accessAbstract
Many articles on perception, performance, psychophysiology, and neuroscience seek to relate pairs of time series through assessments of their cross-correlations. Most such series are individually autocorrelated: they do not comprise independent values. Given this situation, an unfounded reliance is often placed on cross-correlation as an indicator of relationships (e.g., referent vs. response, leading vs. following). Such cross-correlations can indicate spurious relationships, because of autocorrelation. Given these dangers, we here simulated how and why such spurious conclusions can arise, to provide an approach to resolving them. We show that when multiple pairs of series are aggregated in several different ways for a cross-correlation analysis, problems remain. Finally, even a genuine cross-correlation function does not answer key motivating questions, such as whether there are likely causal relationships between the series. Thus, we illustrate how to obtain a transfer function describing such relationships, informed by any genuine cross-correlations. We illustrate the confounds and the meaningful transfer functions by two concrete examples, one each in perception and performance, together with key elements of the R software code needed. The approach involves autocorrelation functions, the establishment of stationarity, prewhitening, the determination of cross-correlation functions, the assessment of Granger causality, and autoregressive model development. Autocorrelation also limits the interpretability of other measures of possible relationships between pairs of time series, such as mutual information. We emphasize that further complexity may be required as the appropriate analysis is pursued fully, and that causal intervention experiments will likely also be needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cross‐correlation applied to nonstationary and autocorrelated time series, such as cardiac signals, may lead to spurious results (Dean and Dunsmuir 2016).”
From Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony During Dyadic Joint Action Is Increased by Task Novelty and Reduced by Social Anxiety (2025) · cites this paper as Dean and Dunsmuir 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, physiological signals, especially heart rate, often exhibit autocorrelation.”
From Interpersonal Synchronization of Autonomic Physiology via Mere Visual Contact (2026) · cites this paper as [110]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breitung, J., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076916 · Cited by 11,114
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · Cited by 8,540
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Hamilton, J. D. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691218632 · Cited by 7,941
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 1×
“This may also be one component of the reasons for the unreliability of results in fields such as neuroimaging (Button et al., 2013; Carp, 2012), which we will not consider directly here.”
ResultApplied econometric time series
Enders, W. (1995) · Journal of Macroeconomics · doi:10.1016/0164-0704(95)80068-9 · Cited by 4,902
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/h0078016 · Cited by 3,270
Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801686 · Cited by 3,253
Applied Econometric Time Series.
mw, & Enders, W. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291367 · Cited by 2,991
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Smith, G. M. (2007) · Statistics in the health sciences · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45972-1 · Cited by 2,505
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Body sway reflects leadership in joint music performance
Chang, A., Livingstone, S. R., Bosnyak, D. J., & Trainor, L. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1617657114 · Cited by 166
Stitching and registering highly multiplexed whole-slide images of tissues and tumors using ASHLAR
Muhlich, J. L., Chen, Y., Yapp, C., Russell, D., Santagata, S., & Sorger, P. K. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac544 · Cited by 140
Higgins, T. S., Wu, A. W., Sharma, D., Illing, E. A., Rubel, K., Ting, J. Y., & Snot Force Alliance (2020) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/19702 · Cited by 129
Li, F., Lozier, M. S., Bacon, S., Bower, A. S., Cunningham, S. A., de Jong, M. F., deYoung, B., Fraser, N., Fried, N., Han, G., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23350-2 · Cited by 116
HyPyP: a Hyperscanning Python Pipeline for inter-brain connectivity analysis
Ayrolles, A., Brun, F., Chen, P., Djalovski, A., Beauxis, Y., Delorme, R., Bourgeron, T., Dikker, S., & Dumas, G. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa141 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, R. T., & Dunsmuir, W. T. M.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dean, Roger T.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2015-06-23
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 783-802
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W815444466
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- cross correlation function, autocorrelation, spurious correlations, transfer function, autoregressive models, Granger causality, prewhitening, stationarity, mutual information, time series analysis, perception, performance, psychophysiology, motion analysis, neuroscience
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Movement, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosciences, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Software, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
