Cited by 17Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Education and ValidationAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version on alcohol use disorders identification test

Zhang·2017·PubMed

Abstract

AUDIT showed good reliability and validity among medical students in China thus worth for promotion on its use.

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.08.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang
Venue
PubMed
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Published
2017-08-10
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1064-1067
OpenAlex
W3025680729
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, auditing, alcohol screening, Chinese version, reliability statistics, validity, medical students
MeSH terms
China, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review