The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People are Affected by Environments for Work
Abstract
Inquiry into how people experience environmental conditions at work is a growing area of study. Until the 1980s, there was insufficient research on ‘workspaces’—and on office environments in particular—to warrant review. Since that time, the range and number of studies of workspace have burgeoned. This paper will identify and review the main themes and findings of this area of research with the objective of defining basic parameters and prevailing theories of the environmental psychology of workspace. These will generate questions and directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0381 · Cited by 8,220
Field Theory in Social Science
French, R. L., Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1953) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418749 · Cited by 5,190
Dunnette, M. D., & Herzberg, F. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391218 · Cited by 3,170
Handbook of environmental psychology
Stokols, D., & Altman, I. (1987) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 2,990
Field Theory in Social Science
Eysenck, H. J., & Lewin, K. (1952) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/586914 · Cited by 2,272
Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion.
Stokols, D. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.47.1.6 · Cited by 2,009
The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact.
Adair, J. G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334 · Cited by 1,095 · cited 1×
“These findings are reminiscent of the changes in task performance found in the 1940’s in the famous Hawthorne studies of lighting in factories, suggesting that any environmental change improves team performance regardless of its actual effect (Adair, 1984).”
Result(1975) · Cited by 1,065
Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N. C., Jacobsen, K., & Roos, G. (1999) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/s0263-2373(99)00019-5 · Cited by 905
Cited by
Evaluating user experience in green buildings in relation to workplace culture and context
Brown, Z., Cole, R. J., Robinson, J., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2010) · Facilities · doi:10.1108/02632771011023168 · Cited by 114
The psychological effects of the physical healthcare environment on healthcare personnel
Tanja-Dijkstra, K., & Pieterse, M. E. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006210.pub3 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Vischer, J. C.
- Venue
- Architectural Science Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-108
- ISSN
- 0003-8628 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-9622
- OpenAlex
- W2101034350
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People are Affected by Environments for Work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3763/asre.2008.5114
- The paper
- Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People are Affected by Environments for Work. Architectural Science Review. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
