Cited by 99Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEU Law and Policy AnalysisInternational Environmental Law and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland

JARAITĖ, JŪRATĖ, CONVERY, FRANK, DI MARIA, CORRADO·2010·Climate Policy

Abstract

Until now, there has been little empirical evidence that EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) transaction costs are incurred at firm level. The transaction costs (internal costs, capital costs, consultancy and trading costs) incurred by Irish firms under the EU ETS during its pilot phase (2005–2007) were measured and analysed. Evidence for the sources of transaction costs, their magnitude and the distribution of costs shows that these were mainly administrative in nature. Considerable variation in costs was found due to economies of scale, as the costs per tonne of CO2 were lower for participants with larger allocations. For the largest firms—accounting for over half the emissions—average transaction costs were €0.05 per tonne. However, for small firms, average transaction costs were €2.02—over 18% of the current allowance price. This supports the concerns that transaction costs are excessive for smaller participants. The immediate policy implication is that additional attention will be needed to address different sizes of firms, number of installations per firm, and the size of the initial allocations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3763/cpol.2009.0659

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Alexeeva-Talebi V., 2007, Developing Supra-European Emissions Trading Schemes: An Efficiency and International Trade Analysis, ZEW—Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (Centre for European Economic Research)
  2. Betz R., 2005, Emissions Trading to Combat Climate Change: The Impact of Scheme Design on Transaction Costs
  3. 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1996.tb00615.x · DOI
  4. Capros P., 2000, The Economic Effects of EU-Wide Industry Level Emissions Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gases, results from PRIME Energy-Systems Model
  5. 10.1023/A:1022254913539 · DOI
  6. CEC, 2008, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve and Extend the EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading System: Impact Assessment
  7. 10.1086/466560 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Conrad K., 1996, Energy Policy 24, 1051
  9. 10.1093/reep/ren020 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/reep/rem010 · DOI
  11. EEA, 2008, Application of the Emissions Trading Directive by EU Member States: Reporting Year 2007, EEA Technical Report, European Environmental Agency
  12. Ellerman A. D., 2005, Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program, Cambridge University Press
  13. ENVIROS, 2006, Appraisal of Years 1–4 of the UK Emissions Trading Scheme
  14. EPA, 2005, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Ireland's National Allocation Methodology, Allocation Decision 2005–2007, Environmental Protection Agency Ireland (EPA)
  15. European Commission DG Environment, 2006, Review of EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Survey Results
  16. 10.2307/3146955 · DOI
  17. Hahn R. W., 1989, Ecology Law Quarterly, 16, 361
  18. Joskow P. L., 1998, American Economic Review, 88, 669
  19. Kerr S., 1998, Transaction Costs and Tradable Permit Markets: The United States Lead Phasedown, draft manuscript, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research
  20. Klepper G., 2005, Emissions Trading, CDM, JI and More: The Climate Strategy of the EU, Kiel Working Paper No. 1238
  21. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.002 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X · DOI
  23. OECD, 2001, Transaction Costs and Multifunctionality Main Issues, OECD Analytical Framework Guiding Policy Design Working Paper
  24. Peterson S., 2006, Efficient Abatement in Separated Carbon Markets: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Kiel Working Paper No. 1271
  25. Rao P. K., 2003, The Economics of Transaction Costs: Theory, Methods and Applications, 10.1057/9780230597686 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF02933576 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/jeem.1995.1036 · DOI
  28. Tietenberg T. H., 2006, Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice
  29. Trotignon R., 2008, Compliance Behavior in the EU-ETS: Cross Border Trading, Banking and Borrowing, Working Paper, MIT-CEEPR (MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research)

Metadata

Authors
JARAITĖ, J., CONVERY, F., & DI MARIA, C.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2010-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
190-215
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W3123821872
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
Keywords
EU Emissions Trading System, transaction costs, carbon pricing, small business, economies of scale, pilot phase, Ireland, administrative costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3763/cpol.2009.0659
The paper
JARAITĖ, J., CONVERY, F., & DI MARIA, C. (2010). Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0659