The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland
Abstract
Until now, there has been little empirical evidence that EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) transaction costs are incurred at firm level. The transaction costs (internal costs, capital costs, consultancy and trading costs) incurred by Irish firms under the EU ETS during its pilot phase (2005–2007) were measured and analysed. Evidence for the sources of transaction costs, their magnitude and the distribution of costs shows that these were mainly administrative in nature. Considerable variation in costs was found due to economies of scale, as the costs per tonne of CO2 were lower for participants with larger allocations. For the largest firms—accounting for over half the emissions—average transaction costs were €0.05 per tonne. However, for small firms, average transaction costs were €2.02—over 18% of the current allowance price. This supports the concerns that transaction costs are excessive for smaller participants. The immediate policy implication is that additional attention will be needed to address different sizes of firms, number of installations per firm, and the size of the initial allocations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, there is an indication that transaction costs (internal costs, capital costs, consultancy and trading costs; see Betz & Schmidt, Citation2016; Jaraite, Convery, & Di Maria, Citation2010), as well as costs for MRV of emissions (see Heindl, Citation2017) in the EU ETS vary strongly across firm size in a way that affects small and medium sized firms most seriously.”
From Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms' competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2019) · cites this paper as Jaraite et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Alexeeva-Talebi V., 2007, Developing Supra-European Emissions Trading Schemes: An Efficiency and International Trade Analysis, ZEW—Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (Centre for European Economic Research)
- Betz R., 2005, Emissions Trading to Combat Climate Change: The Impact of Scheme Design on Transaction Costs
- 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1996.tb00615.x · DOI
- Capros P., 2000, The Economic Effects of EU-Wide Industry Level Emissions Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gases, results from PRIME Energy-Systems Model
- 10.1023/A:1022254913539 · DOI
- CEC, 2008, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve and Extend the EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading System: Impact Assessment
- 10.1086/466560 · DOI · Paper page
- Conrad K., 1996, Energy Policy 24, 1051
- 10.1093/reep/ren020 · DOI
- 10.1093/reep/rem010 · DOI
- EEA, 2008, Application of the Emissions Trading Directive by EU Member States: Reporting Year 2007, EEA Technical Report, European Environmental Agency
- Ellerman A. D., 2005, Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program, Cambridge University Press
- ENVIROS, 2006, Appraisal of Years 1–4 of the UK Emissions Trading Scheme
- EPA, 2005, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Ireland's National Allocation Methodology, Allocation Decision 2005–2007, Environmental Protection Agency Ireland (EPA)
- European Commission DG Environment, 2006, Review of EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Survey Results
- 10.2307/3146955 · DOI
- Hahn R. W., 1989, Ecology Law Quarterly, 16, 361
- Joskow P. L., 1998, American Economic Review, 88, 669
- Kerr S., 1998, Transaction Costs and Tradable Permit Markets: The United States Lead Phasedown, draft manuscript, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research
- Klepper G., 2005, Emissions Trading, CDM, JI and More: The Climate Strategy of the EU, Kiel Working Paper No. 1238
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X · DOI
- OECD, 2001, Transaction Costs and Multifunctionality Main Issues, OECD Analytical Framework Guiding Policy Design Working Paper
- Peterson S., 2006, Efficient Abatement in Separated Carbon Markets: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Kiel Working Paper No. 1271
- Rao P. K., 2003, The Economics of Transaction Costs: Theory, Methods and Applications, 10.1057/9780230597686 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02933576 · DOI
- 10.1006/jeem.1995.1036 · DOI
- Tietenberg T. H., 2006, Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice
- Trotignon R., 2008, Compliance Behavior in the EU-ETS: Cross Border Trading, Banking and Borrowing, Working Paper, MIT-CEEPR (MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- JARAITĖ, J., CONVERY, F., & DI MARIA, C.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- ORCID
- JARAITĖ, JŪRATĖ
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-215
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W3123821872
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Keywords
- EU Emissions Trading System, transaction costs, carbon pricing, small business, economies of scale, pilot phase, Ireland, administrative costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3763/cpol.2009.0659
- The paper
- JARAITĖ, J., CONVERY, F., & DI MARIA, C. (2010). Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0659