The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Analysis of Digital Media Literacy Education Structures and Teaching Materials in British Columbia, Canada : Focusing on Information and News Credibility Verification and Media Representation
Abstract
This study analyzed digital media literacy education in British Columbia’s (BC) English Language Arts curriculum and public schools to inform the effective implementation of digital media literacy education in South Korea, following the introduction of the ‘Media’ domain in South Korea’s revised 2022 Language Arts curriculum. Document analysis was conducted on BC’s English curriculum, the Digital Literacy Framework, and teaching resources from specialized organizations such as CIVIX and Common Sense Media. Findings reveal that BC clearly defines digital literacy concepts and integrates these across multiple subjects, emphasizing language and texts as crucial resources for identity formation, social relationships, and civic engagement. Classroom activities involved verifying online information credibility, differentiating reliable news from misinformation, and creating forced perspective images. Recommendations for Korean education include clarifying core media literacy concepts, expanding integrated instruction, providing opportunities for creative production and critical reflection, and strengthening teacher professional development. Ultimately, digital media literacy education must prioritize critical thinking and responsible civic engagement beyond technical skills.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Korean Association for Literacy, & Jeong, H.-S.
- Corresponding author
- Jeong, Hyeon-Seon
- ORCID
- Jeong, Hyeon-Seon
- Venue
- Korean Association for Literacy
- Publisher
- Korean Association for Literacy
- Published
- 2025-06-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 127-166
- OpenAlex
- W4413298585
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- news credibility, misinformation, media representation, English language arts curriculum, digital literacy framework, teaching materials, teacher professional development, critical thinking, citizen participation, British Columbia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review