The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of the Open Field Maze to Measure Locomotor and Anxiety-like Behavior in Mice
Open accessAbstract
Animal models have proven to be invaluable to researchers trying to answer questions regarding the mechanisms of behavior. The Open Field Maze is one of the most commonly used platforms to measure behaviors in animal models. It is a fast and relatively easy test that provides a variety of behavioral information ranging from general ambulatory ability to data regarding the emotionality of the subject animal. As it relates to rodent models, the procedure allows the study of different strains of mice or rats both laboratory bred and wild-captured. The technique also readily lends itself to the investigation of different pharmacological compounds for anxiolytic or anxiogenic effects. Here, a protocol for use of the open field maze to describe mouse behaviors is detailed and a simple analysis of general locomotor ability and anxiety-related emotional behaviors between two strains of C57BL/6 mice is performed. Briefly, using the described protocol we show Wild Type mice exhibited significantly less anxiety related behaviors than did age-matched Knock Out mice while both strains exhibited similar ambulatory ability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kim, M.-S., Kim, Y., Choi, H., Kim, W., Park, S., Lee, D., Kim, D. K., Kim, H. J., Choi, H., Hyun, D.-W., et al. (2020) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317431 · Cited by 614
Luo, R., Su, L.-Y., Li, G., Yang, J., Liu, Q., Yang, L.-X., Zhang, D.-F., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Fan, Y., et al. (2020) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2019.1596488 · Cited by 364
Chow, H.-M., Shi, M., Cheng, A., Gao, Y., Chen, G., Song, X., So, R. W. L., Zhang, J., & Herrup, K. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0505-1 · Cited by 171
Correia, P. A., Lottem, E., Banerjee, D., Machado, A. S., Carey, M. R., & Mainen, Z. F. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.20975 · Cited by 138
Sahasrabuddhe, V., & Ghosh, H. S. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110252 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Seibenhener, M. L., & Wooten, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Visualized Experiments
- Publisher
- MyJove Corporation
- Published
- 2015-02-06
- Issue
- 96
- Pages
- e52434-e52434
- ISSN
- 1940-087X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025500109
- Cited by
- 1,462
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the Open Field Maze to Measure Locomotor and Anxiety-like Behavior in Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3791/52434
- The paper
- Seibenhener, M. L., & Wooten, M. C. (2015). Use of the Open Field Maze to Measure Locomotor and Anxiety-like Behavior in Mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://doi.org/10.3791/52434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.