Cited by 754Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and Cortisol

The Forced Swim Test as a Model of Depressive-like Behavior

Open access
Yankelevitch-Yahav, Roni, Franko, Motty, Huly, Avrham, Doron, Ravid·2015·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

The goal of the present protocol is to describe the forced swim test (FST), which is one of the most commonly used assays for the study of depressive-like behavior in rodents. The FST is based on the assumption that when placing an animal in a container filled with water, it will first make efforts to escape but eventually will exhibit immobility that may be considered to reflect a measure of behavioral despair. This test has been extensively used because it involves the exposure of the animals to stress, which was shown to have a role in the tendency for major depression. Additionally, the FST has been shown to share some of the factors that are influenced or altered by depression in humans, including changes in food consumption, sleep abnormalities and drug-withdrawal-induced anhedonia. The main advantages of this procedure are that it is relatively easy to perform and that its results are easily and quickly analyzed. Moreover, its sensitivity to a broad range of antidepressant drugs that makes it a suitable screening test is one of the most important features leading to its high predictive validity. Despite its appeal, this model has a number of disadvantages. First, the issue of chronic augmentation is problematic in this test because in real life patients need to be treated for at least several weeks before they experience any relief from their symptoms. Last, due to the aversiveness of the FST, it is important to take into account possible influences it might have on brain structure/function if brain analyses are to be carried out following this procedure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/52587

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The forced swim test is a preclinical assay for antidepressant potential with high predictive validity.

    “The forced swim test is a preclinical assay for antidepressant potential with high predictive validity (176, 177)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yankelevitch-Yahav, R., Franko, M., Huly, A., & Doron, R.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo (IL)
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2015-03-02
Issue
97
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030260775
Cited by
754
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
forced swim test, depression-like behavior, behavioral despair, immobility, rodent models of depression, antidepressant screening, stress, anhedonia, drug withdrawal, sleep abnormalities, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Swimming, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review