Cited by 7Aquaculture disease management and microbiotaZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

Immunization of Adult Zebrafish for the Preclinical Screening of DNA-based Vaccines

Open access
Myllymäki, Henna, Niskanen, Mirja, Oksanen, Kaisa, Rämet, Mika·2018·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

The interest in DNA-based vaccination has increased during the past two decades. DNA vaccination is based on the cloning of a sequence of a selected antigen or a combination of antigens into a plasmid, which enables a tailor-made and safe design. The administration of DNA vaccines into host cells leads to the expression of antigens that stimulate both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. This report describes a protocol for the cloning of antigen sequences into the pCMV-EGFP plasmid, the immunization of adult zebrafish with the vaccine candidates by intramuscular microinjection, and the subsequent electroporation to improve intake. The vaccine antigens are expressed as green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fusion proteins, which allows the confirmation of the antigen expression under UV light from live fish and the quantification of expression levels of the fusion protein with ELISA, as well as their detection with a western blot analysis. The protective effect of the vaccine candidates is tested by infecting the fish with Mycobacterium marinum five weeks postvaccination, followed by the quantification of the bacteria with qPCR four weeks later. Compared to mammalian preclinical screening models, this method provides a cost-effective method for the preliminary screening of novel DNA-based vaccine candidates against a mycobacterial infection. The method can be further applied to screening DNA-based vaccines against various bacterial and viral diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/58453

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A comparable result had been previously observed after intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA into adult zebrafish, showing nucleic acid entering myocytes and antigen-presenting cells at the site of administration.

    “A comparable result had been previously observed after intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA into adult zebrafish and showed the nucleic acid entering the cells (myocytes and antigen-presenting cells [APCs]) at the site of administration.28”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Tang, D.C., DeVit, M., Johnston, S.A. Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response. Nature. 356 (6365), 152-154 (1992).
  2. Evensen, O., Leong, J.A. DNA vaccines against viral diseases of farmed fish. Fish Shellfish Immunology. 35 (6), 1751-1758 (2013).
  3. Sommerset, I., Lorenzen, E., Lorenzen, N., Bleie, H., Nerland, A.H. A DNA vaccine directed against a rainbow trout rhabdovirus induces early protection against a nodavirus challenge in turbot. Vaccine. 21 (32), 4661-4667 (2003).
  4. Li, L., Petrovsky, N. Molecular mechanisms for enhanced DNA vaccine immunogenicity. Expert Review of Vaccines. 15 (3), 313-329 (2016).
  5. Embregts, C.W.E. et al. Intramuscular DNA Vaccination of Juvenile Carp against Spring Viremia of Carp Virus Induces Full Protection and Establishes a Virus-Specific B and T Cell Response. Frontiers in Immunology. 8, 1340 (2017).
  6. Lorenzen, N., LaPatra, S.E. DNA vaccines for aquacultured fish. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics). 24 (1), 201-213 (2005).
  7. Oksanen, K.E. et al. An adult zebrafish model for preclinical tuberculosis vaccine development. Vaccine. 31 (45), 5202-5209 (2013).
  8. Matsuda, T., Cepko, C.L. Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 (1) (2004).
  9. Cho, J.H., Youn, J.W., Sung, Y.C. Cross-priming as a predominant mechanism for inducing CD8(+) T cell responses in gene gun DNA immunization. The Journal of Immunology. 167 (10), 5549-5557 (2001).
  10. Lewis, K.L., Del Cid, N., Traver, D. Perspectives on antigen presenting cells in zebrafish. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 46 (1), 63-73 (2014).
  11. Shao, T. et al. Characterization of surface phenotypic molecules of teleost dendritic cells. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 49 (1), 38-43 (2015).
  12. Utke, K. et al. Cell-mediated immune responses in rainbow trout after DNA immunization against the viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 32 (3), 239-252 (2008).
  13. Cuesta, A. et al. An active DNA vaccine against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) with a different mode of action than fish rhabdovirus DNA vaccines. Vaccine. 28 (19), 3291-3300 (2010).
  14. Iwanami, N. Zebrafish as a model for understanding the evolution of the vertebrate immune system and human primary immunodeficiency. Experimental Hematology. 42 (8), 697-706 (2014).
  15. Patterson, H. et al. Adult zebrafish model of bacterial meningitis in Streptococcus agalactiae infection. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 38 (3), 447-455 (2012).
  16. Cronan, M.R., Tobin, D.M. Fit for consumption: zebrafish as a model for tuberculosis. Disease Model & Mechanisms. 7 (7), 777-784 (2014).
  17. Tobin, D.M., Ramakrishnan, L. Comparative pathogenesis of Mycobacterium marinum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cellular Microbiology. 10 (5), 1027-1039 (2008).
  18. Parikka, M. et al. Mycobacterium marinum causes a latent infection that can be reactivated by gamma irradiation in adult zebrafish. PLoS Pathogens. 8 (9), e1002944 (2012).
  19. Rounioja, S. et al. Defense of zebrafish embryos against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is dependent on the phagocytic activity of leukocytes. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 36 (2), 342-348 (2012).
  20. Myllymaki, H., Bauerlein, C.A., Ramet, M. The Zebrafish Breathes New Life into the Study of Tuberculosis. Frontiers in Immunology. 7, 196 (2016).
  21. Myllymaki, H. et al. Identification of novel antigen candidates for a tuberculosis vaccine in the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). PLoS One. 12 (7), e0181942 (2017).
  22. Ingolotti, M., Kawalekar, O., Shedlock, D.J., Muthumani, K., Weiner, D.B. DNA vaccines for targeting bacterial infections. Expert Review of Vaccines. 9 (7), 747-763 (2010).
  23. Kozak, M. Recognition of AUG and alternative initiator codons is augmented by G in position +4 but is not generally affected by the nucleotides in positions +5 and +6. The EMBO Journal. 16 (9), 2482-2492 (1997).
  24. Matthews, M., Varga, Z.M. Anesthesia and euthanasia in zebrafish. ILAR Journal. 53 (2), 192-204 (2012).
  25. Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 9 (7), 671-675 (2012).
  26. Hammaren, M.M. et al. Adequate Th2-type response associates with restricted bacterial growth in latent mycobacterial infection of zebrafish. PLoS Pathogens. 10 (6), e1004190 (2014).
  27. McCaffrey, J., Donnelly, R.F., McCarthy, H.O. Microneedles: an innovative platform for gene delivery. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 5 (4), 424-437 (2015).
  28. Lorenzen, E., Lorenzen, N., Einer-Jensen, K., Brudeseth, B., Evensen, O. Time course study of in situ expression of antigens following DNA- vaccination against VHS in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) fry. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 19 (1), 27-41 (2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myllymäki, H., Niskanen, M., Oksanen, K., & Rämet, M.
Affiliations
Tampere University (FI)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2018-10-30
Issue
140
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899466457
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö
  • Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö
  • Tampereen Tuberkuloosisäätiö
  • Suomen Tuberkuloosin Vastustamisyhdistyksen Säätiö
  • Väinö ja Laina Kiven Säätiö
  • Tays
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
DNA vaccine, zebrafish, vaccine screening, Mycobacterium marinum, GFP fusion protein, plasmid cloning, electroporation, mycobacterial infection, preclinical vaccine testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Vaccines, Disease Models, Animal, Immunity, Cellular, Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous, Vaccination, Zebrafish, Vaccines, DNA, Mycobacterium marinum, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review