Combining an optimized mRNA template with a double purification process allows strong expression of in vitro transcribed mRNA
Open accessAbstract
mRNA is a blooming technology for vaccination and has gained global attention during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the recent clinical trials have highlighted increased reactogenicity when using high mRNA doses. Intending to increase the potency of mRNA therapeutics and to decrease the therapeutic dose, we designed a mRNA backbone and optimized the mRNA purification process. We used the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) reporter gene flanked by one 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and two 3′ UTRs of the human β-globin as a reference mRNA and identified the most promising mRNA sequence using in vitro and in vivo models. First, we assessed the impact of different poly(A) sizes on translation and selected the most optimal sequence. Then, we selected the best 5′ UTR among synthetic sequences displaying a high ribosome loading. Finally, we evaluated the transfection efficiency of our standard mRNA template after two capping strategies and purification using either double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) depletion or dephosphorylation of 5′PPP RNA or both combined. Double purification was shown to give the best results. Altogether, the use of a newly defined 5′ UTR coupled to post-transcriptional treatments will be of great interest in the mRNA vaccine field, by limiting the amount of the antigen-coding transcript and subsequently the formulation components needed for an efficient vaccination.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper optimizes an in vitro transcribed mRNA backbone and purification process to increase expression. It identifies a 148A poly(A) tail, synthetic UTR4, vaccinia capping, and combined dsRNA depletion plus 5′PPP dephosphorylation as improvements, with up to a 3-fold increase in dendritic cells.
Key findings
- A 148A poly(A) tail gave the highest eGFP expression among 76A, 112A, and 148A mRNAs; in DC2.4 cells, 148A-mRNA increased eGFP expression by 65% versus 76A-mRNA and 25% versus 112A-mRNA by AUC.
- Synthetic 5′ UTR4 produced the highest translation among UTR1–UTR6; compared with standard β-globin 148A-mRNA, UTR4 increased eGFP expression by 33% in HeLa cells, 37% in DC2.4 cells, and 80% in human moDCs.
- Vaccinia virus capping was more efficient than ARCA capping, giving +67% eGFP expression in HeLa cells and +45% in DC2.4 cells.
- Double purification—cellulose dsRNA depletion plus Antarctic phosphatase dephosphorylation—gave the best eGFP expression in DC2.4 and moDCs; a 3-fold increase was observed between dephosphorylated/dsRNA-depleted vaccinia mRNA and untreated ARCA mRNA in DC2.4 cells, and a 3-fold increase between dephosphorylated/dsRNA-depleted and untreated ARCA mRNA in moDCs. dsRNA depletion also lowered IFN-α and TNF-α in moDCs, while phosphatase treatment did not decrease those cytokines versus untreated mRNA.
Methods
- The eGFP reporter was flanked by a 5′ UTR and two tandem copies of the human β-globin 3′ UTR; plasmids carried poly(A) tails of 76, 112, or 148 units, and synthetic 5′ UTRs UTR1–UTR6 were selected from a high-ribosome-loading library.
- IVT mRNA was produced with ARCA or vaccinia virus capping and then treated by cellulose chromatography for dsRNA depletion and/or Antarctic phosphatase for 5′PPP dephosphorylation.
- Expression was tested in HeLa, DC2.4, and human moDCs by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry, with AUC analysis and ELISA for IFN-α/TNF-α; in vivo work used zebrafish embryo microinjection and adult zebrafish intramuscular injection of naked mRNA or mRNA-LNP complexes.
Limitations
- The paper states that it will be important to compare UTR4’s added value relative to the 5′ β-globin UTR in mouse and non-human primate models.
- The paper notes that vaccinia capping is more complex, requires extra production/purification steps, must be validated for every batch, and is more time-consuming and laborious than ARCA capping.
- The paper states that high ribosome loading is not always correlated with high protein expression, so selected 5′ and 3′ UTRs should be validated for the gene of interest and target cell type; it also notes that the commercial L7601 mRNA’s untranslated and codon-optimized sequences are unknown, so the cell-line discrepancy cannot be discussed. Evident from the text: adult zebrafish in vivo results are described as qualitative, and moDC transfection efficiency and viability were lower than in HeLa and DC2.4 cells.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
14 of 32 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Double-stranded RNA generated during in vitro transcription synthesis is the major contributor to immunogenicity.
“Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) generated during in vitro transcription (IVT) synthesis is the major contributor in the immunogenicity.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Mu, 2018, An origin of the immunogenicity of in vitro transcribed RNA, Nucleic Acids Res. source
- Premisecitation
dsRNA removal through HPLC or cellulose methods drastically enhances the translational efficiency of IVT mRNAs.
“It has been shown that dsRNA removal through HPLC or cellulose methods drastically enhances the translational efficiency of IVT mRNAs.13,14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Karikó, 2011, Generating the optimal mRNA for therapy: HPLC purification eliminates immune activation and improves translation of nucleoside-modified, protein-encoding mRNA, Nucleic Acids Res. source
- cites [14] Baiersdörfer, 2019, A Facile Method for the Removal of dsRNA Contaminant from In Vitro-Transcribed mRNA, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
The Results section (“Cellulose-Purified IVT mRNA Translates Better In Vivo”; page unavailable) reports substantially higher protein levels after purification of U-containing mRNA and says cellulose and HPLC similarly increase its translational capacity. But for m1Ψ-containing mRNA, the increase after either method was minor and not statistically significant. The unqualified claim that purification drastically enhances translation of IVT mRNAs overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
High doses of mRNA formulated with lipid nanoparticles caused side effects in the clinical trial candidates mRNA-1273 and BNT162b1.
“Indeed, the use of high doses of mRNA formulated with lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) resulted in some side effects in the candidates mRNA-1273 and BNT162b1.3,4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Jackson, 2020, An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report, N. Engl. J. Med source
- cites [4] Mulligan, 2020, Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults, Nature source
- Rests on an assumption: Increasing mRNA expression or potency will allow decreasing the therapeutic dose and reactogenicity.
- Findingcitation
Using a new set of 5′ UTR synthetic sequences based on selection of synthetic 5′ UTRs with high ribosome loading improved mRNA translation.
“Here, we improved the mRNA translation by using a new set of 5′ UTR synthetic sequences based on the selection of synthetic 5′ UTRs with high ribosome loading.22”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Sample, 2019, Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Findingown data
In human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, a 3-fold increase of eGFP expression was observed between dephosphorylated/dsRNA-depleted mRNA and untreated mRNA.
“The results obtained were comparable with those generated with DC2.4 cells but revealed a higher increase of eGFP expression between the dephosphorylated/dsRNA depleted mRNA and untreated mRNA (3-fold).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Only UTR4 mRNA allowed production of a significantly higher level of eGFP than L7601 mRNA in DC2.4 cells.
“Hence, only UTR4 mRNA allowed us to produce a significantly higher level of eGFP than L7601 mRNA in DC2.4 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In HeLa cells, UTR4 mRNA generated 33% more eGFP compared with the standard β-globin 148A-mRNA.
“Moreover, the UTR4 mRNA generated 33% more eGFP compared with the standard β-globin 148A-mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cellulose purification alone offered an increase in protein expression compared with untreated 148A-mRNA, especially in DC2.4 cell assays.
“Cellulose purification alone offered an increase in protein expression compared with untreated 148A-mRNA, especially in DC2.4 cell assays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
mRNA with a 148 A tail offers the best mRNA translation efficiency into DC2.4 cells.
“showed that this mRNA offers the best mRNA translation efficiency into DC2.4 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, phosphatase treatment did not decrease the levels of IFN-α and TNF-α compared with untreated mRNA.
“Phosphatase treatment did not decrease the levels of IFN-α and TNF-α in comparison to untreated mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, a 65% increase in eGFP expression was obtained with 148A-mRNA compared with 76A-mRNA.
“Thus, a 65% and a 25% increase in eGFP expression were obtained with 148A-mRNA in comparison to 76A- and 112A-mRNAs, respectively (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In adult zebrafish, eGFP expression was better with mRNA-LNP complexes than with naked mRNA.
“Moreover, a better eGFP expression was obtained with mRNA-LNP complexes than with naked mRNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In vitro cell lines and zebrafish models predict human mRNA vaccine performance.
- Findingown data
In human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, UTR2 mRNA also showed significantly better translation efficiency compared with 148A-mRNA.
“Contrarily to the results obtained with HeLa and DC2.4 cell lines, the UTR2 mRNA also showed a significantly better translation efficiency in moDCs compared with 148A-mRNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Depletion of dsRNA decreases the production of IFN-α and TNF-α in moDCs in comparison to untreated mRNA.
“As shown in Figures 7D and 7E, depletion of dsRNA decreases the production of IFN-α and TNF-α in moDCs in comparison to untreated mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, the lowest IFN-α and TNF-α amounts were detected in the supernatant of cells transfected with dsRNA-depleted mRNA.
“The lowest IFN-α and TNF-α amounts were detected in the supernatant of moDCs transfected with dsRNA-depleted mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In HeLa cells, at 24 h post-transfection, fluorescence microscopy revealed higher eGFP expression with UTR4 mRNA compared with other mRNAs.
“At 24 h post-transfection, fluorescence microscopy revealed a higher eGFP expression with UTR4 mRNA compared with other mRNAs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In HeLa cells, 148A-mRNA significantly increased overall eGFP expression compared with 76A- and 112A-mRNAs by area under the curve analysis.
“After assessment of the area under the curve (AUC) (Figure 2C), the 148A-mRNA significantly increased the overall eGFP expression in comparison to 76A- and 112A-mRNAs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 24 h, eGFP expression intensity was significantly higher with 148A-mRNA than with 76A-mRNA in HeLa cells.
“At 24 h, the intensity of expression was significantly higher with 148A-mRNA than with 76A-mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, fluorescence images at 24 h post-transfection showed that UTR4 mRNA presented the highest eGFP production.
“Fluorescence images of DC2.4 cells realized 24 h post-transfection showed that UTR4 mRNA presented the highest eGFP production (Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In HeLa cells, the different purification treatments had no significant impact on translation of ARCA-capped mRNA or vaccinia-capped mRNA.
“As presented in Figure 7A, the different treatments had no significant impact either in the translation of ARCA-capped mRNA or in vaccinia-capped mRNA in HeLa cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In zebrafish embryos, 148A-mRNA provided the highest eGFP expression at 24 and 48 h post-injection by microscopy.
“Fluorescence analysis of zebrafish embryos at 24 and 48 h post-injection by microscopy (Figure S3) showed that 148A-mRNA provided the highest eGFP expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In vitro cell lines and zebrafish models predict human mRNA vaccine performance.
- Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, eGFP expression of ARCA-capped mRNA was significantly increased approximately 2-fold after cellulose purification and dephosphorylation.
“Hence, the eGFP expression of ARCA-capped mRNA was significantly increased (∼2-fold) after cellulose purification and dephosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The positive effect of double purification is more pronounced in DCs (moDCs and DC2.4 cells) than in HeLa cells.
“The positive effect of the double purification is more pronounced in DCs (moDCs and DC2.4 cells) than in HeLa cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among synthetic 5′ UTRs, UTR4 provided the highest translation efficiency, with a 33%, 37%, and 80% increase in eGFP expression compared with the standard 5′ UTR human β-globin in HeLa cells, DC2.4 cells, and moDCs, respectively.
“Among these synthetic 5′ UTRs, UTR4 provided the highest translation efficiency, with a 33%, 37%, and 80% increase in eGFP expression compared with the standard 5′ UTR human β-globin in HeLa cells, DC2.4 cells, and moDCs, respectively (Figures 4, 5, and 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, a 25% increase in eGFP expression was obtained with 148A-mRNA compared with 112A-mRNA.
“Thus, a 65% and a 25% increase in eGFP expression were obtained with 148A-mRNA in comparison to 76A- and 112A-mRNAs, respectively (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, an 80% increase of eGFP production was observed with UTR4 mRNA compared with 148A-mRNA.
“An 80% increase of eGFP production was observed with UTR4 mRNA compared with 148A-mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, 148A-mRNA resulted in higher eGFP expression compared with 76A- and 112A-mRNAs at 24 and 48 h post-transfection and over the complete time course.
“The 148A-mRNA resulted in higher eGFP expression compared with 76A- and 112A-mRNAs at 24 and 48 h post-transfection (Figure 3B) and also considering the complete time course study (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, a 37% increase in eGFP expression was obtained with UTR4 mRNA compared with 148A-mRNA.
“Thus, a 37% increase in eGFP expression was obtained with the UTR4 mRNA in comparison to 148A-mRNA, illustrating the added value of this specific 5′ UTR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Adequate treatment of IVT mRNA with vaccinia capping, dsRNA depletion, and 5′PPP depletion increased eGFP expression by 3-fold.
“Moreover, adequate treatment of the IVT mRNA (vaccinia capping, dsRNA, and 5′PPP depletions) increased eGFP expression by 3-fold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: eGFP reporter mRNA expression results generalize to antigen-coding mRNA and mRNA vaccines.
- Findingown data
Using NEB stable competent E. coli, a plasmid containing a 148 A tail can be propagated and maintained.
“By using highly stable bacteria (New England Biolabs [NEB] stable competent Escherichia coli strain), we have been able to propagate and maintain a plasmid containing a 148 A tail”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The amount of dsRNA depended on the method used for mRNA production, being higher in the ARCA than the vaccinia capping system.
“Interestingly, the amount of dsRNA depended on the method used for mRNA production, being higher in the ARCA than the vaccinia capping system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The optimized IVT mRNA platform provides up to a 3-fold expression increase.
“although we provide promising results for the optimization of the IVT mRNA platform with up to a 3-fold expression increase”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Vaccinia virus-capped mRNAs provided a higher eGFP expression compared with ARCA-capped mRNA in both HeLa and DC2.4 cell lines.
“Vaccinia virus-capped mRNAs provided a higher eGFP expression compared with ARCA-capped mRNA in both cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, fluorescence microscopy showed the highest eGFP expression with 148A-mRNA.
“Akin to HeLa cells, fluorescence microscopy analysis showed the highest expression with 148A-mRNA (Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In adult zebrafish injected intramuscularly, eGFP expression was higher with UTR4 than with 148A and UTR2 mRNAs.
“This qualitative study indicated a higher eGFP expression with UTR4 than with 148A and UTR2 mRNAs and confirmed the results obtained in vitro.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In vitro cell lines and zebrafish models predict human mRNA vaccine performance.
- Findingown data
Among all transfected types of 148A-mRNAs in DC2.4 cells, those depleted of dsRNA and submitted to dephosphorylation showed the highest eGFP expression independently of the capping procedure.
“Moreover, among all the transfected types of 148A-mRNAs in DC2.4 cells, those depleted of dsRNA and submitted to a dephosphorylation step showed the highest eGFP expression independently of the capping procedure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DC2.4 cells, a 3-fold increase in eGFP expression was observed between dephosphorylated/dsRNA-depleted vaccinia mRNA and untreated ARCA mRNA.
“Finally, a 3-fold increase in eGFP expression was observed between dephosphorylated/dsRNA-depleted vaccinia mRNA and untreated ARCA mRNA in DC2.4 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enzymatic capped mRNA achieves better efficiency than ARCA-capped mRNA in HeLa and DC2.4 cells, with +67% in HeLa and +45% in DC2.4.
“As shown in Figure 7, a better efficiency is achieved with enzymatic capped mRNA compared with ARCA-capped mRNA in the two cell lines used (+67% in HeLa, +45% in DC2.4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Depletion of dsRNA conjugated to a phosphatase treatment increases the translational potential of mRNA, especially in dendritic cells.
“Moreover, the depletion of dsRNA conjugated to a phosphatase treatment increases the translational potential of mRNA, especially in DCs, which are an important target for eliciting a strong immune response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: eGFP reporter mRNA expression results generalize to antigen-coding mRNA and mRNA vaccines.
- Premisecitation
dsRNA production might be related to buffer composition, as a reduction in MgCl2 concentration decreases the synthesis of dsRNA.
“The dsRNA production might be related to the buffer composition, as shown by Mu et al.,12 a reduction in the MgCl2 concentration decreasing the synthesis of dsRNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mu et al.,12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
At 24 h post-transfection, dsRNA has an important impact on the innate immune response.
“Altogether, these results indicate that, at 24 h post transfection, the dsRNA has an important impact on innate immune response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The double treatment of mRNA allows the best eGFP production.
“However, the double treatment of mRNA allows the best eGFP production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The use of synthetic 5′ UTRs in an eGFP reporter mRNA harboring a 148(A) tail increases translation efficiency in HeLa cells or DC2.4 cells compared with a human β-globin UTR-containing and a commercial eGFP mRNA control.
“Hence, the use of synthetic 5′ UTRs in an eGFP reporter mRNA harboring a 148(A) tail allows us to increase their translation efficiency in either HeLa cells or DC2.4 cells, a DC model, in comparison to a human β-globin UTR-containing and a commercial eGFP mRNA control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: eGFP reporter mRNA expression results generalize to antigen-coding mRNA and mRNA vaccines.
- Premisecitation
Lessons from phase I clinical trials emphasize the importance of increasing mRNA therapeutic potency to decrease reactogenicity.
“However, lessons learned from phase I of the clinical trials emphasize the importance to increase the potency of mRNA therapeutics to decrease the reactogenicity.2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Wadman, 2020, Fever, aches from Pfizer, Moderna jabs aren’t dangerous but may be intense for some, Science Insider source
- Rests on an assumption: Increasing mRNA expression or potency will allow decreasing the therapeutic dose and reactogenicity.
- Study design and conductown data
After cellulose chromatography, dsRNA depletion was confirmed by dot blot using the J2 anti-dsRNA antibody.
“After cellulose chromatography, dsRNA depletion was confirmed by dot blot using the J2 anti-dsRNA antibody (Figure S8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In phosphatase-treated samples, the presence of dsRNA masks any PRR activation by 5′PPP mRNA.
“In phosphatase-treated samples, the presence of dsRNA masks any PRR activation by 5′PPP mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The better efficiency of enzymatic capped mRNA compared with ARCA-capped mRNA may be due to differences in capping efficiency, cap conformation, and amount of dsRNA.
“This can be due to the difference in capping efficiency (70%–80% with ARCA versus 98%–100% with vaccinia virus system), the cap conformation (Cap-0 in ARCA versus Cap-1 in vaccinia virus system), and the amount of dsRNA, which is more important in mRNA samples produced with the ARCA capping method (Figure S8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Vaccinia virus capping has strong added value.
“This illustrates the strong added value of vaccinia virus capping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
- May combine two claims. 21
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA poly(A) tail of 120 units is considered the standard size for mRNA vaccines.
“A poly(A) tail of 120 units is considered the standard size for mRNA vaccines.9,20,21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Holtkamp, 2006, Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells, Blood source
The Discussion says antigen-encoding RNAs then used in preclinical studies had 30–70-nucleotide poly(A) tails, while those in clinical trials had 64-nucleotide tails. It proposes 120 nucleotides as an improvement, not an established standard; the section on combining modifications calls a 67-base-tail RNA the standard comparator. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] Oliveira, 1995, The relationship between eukaryotic translation and mRNA stability. A short upstream open reading frame strongly inhibits translational initiation and greatly accelerates mRNA degradation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Biol. Chem. source
The Materials and Methods and Results passages discuss yeast cat mRNA constructs and translation, not mRNA vaccines. Searches for “poly(A),” “120 units,” and vaccine-related tail length found no passage in our copy addressing a standard poly(A)-tail size for mRNA vaccines. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] Oh, 2018, Design, Assembly, Production, and Transfection of Synthetic Modified mRNA, Methods source
The Introduction says this protocol attaches a consistent, standardized 120-base poly(A) tail to each mRNA vector. It does not say that 120 bases is the standard size for mRNA vaccines generally; it also describes a 100–250-base range for actively translated eukaryotic mRNAs. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn alternative strategy to avoid poly(A) instability consists of including an internal 10-nucleotide linker into the poly(A) stretch.
“An alternative strategy has been developed to avoid this instability, consisting of including an internal 10-nucleotide linker into the poly(A) stretch.25,26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Stadler, 2017, Elimination of large tumors in mice by mRNA-encoded bispecific antibodies, Nat. Med. source
- cites [26] Trepotec, 2019, Segmented poly(A) tails significantly reduce recombination of plasmid DNA without affecting mRNA translation efficiency or half-life, RNA source
The Results and Discussion section (“Design of modified/segmented poly(A) tails”; page unavailable) describes inserting internal spacers to reduce instability of plasmid-encoded poly(A) tails. It reports spacers of 1, 6, 12, and 24 nucleotides, but not the claimed 10-nucleotide linker. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationdsRNA depletion leads to a decrease of type I IFN and a translational enhancement of the mRNA into transfected DC cells.
“This dsRNA depletion leads to a decrease of type I IFN and a translational enhancement of the mRNA into transfected DC cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Karikó, 2011, Generating the optimal mRNA for therapy: HPLC purification eliminates immune activation and improves translation of nucleoside-modified, protein-encoding mRNA, Nucleic Acids Res. source
The Results report that HPLC purification removed dsRNA contaminants, eliminated type I interferon induction by nucleoside-modified mRNA in transfected dendritic cells, and enhanced translation in those cells. But dsRNA depletion alone is not sufficient to explain the interferon claim: HPLC-purified mRNA without nucleoside modification remained a potent IFN-α inducer. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] Baiersdörfer, 2019, A Facile Method for the Removal of dsRNA Contaminant from In Vitro-Transcribed mRNA, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
The Results section reports that removing dsRNA by HPLC had been shown to eliminate IFN-α secretion by transfected dendritic cells. It also reports enhanced translation after purification, but that experiment measured protein production in mice, not in transfected dendritic cells. The paper further limits the IFN finding: cellulose-purified m1Ψ-containing mRNA no longer induced IFN-α, whereas U-containing mRNA still did. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationdsRNA contaminants can be purified by high-performance liquid chromatography or cellulose chromatography.
“dsRNA contaminants can be purified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or cellulose chromatography13,14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Karikó, 2011, Generating the optimal mRNA for therapy: HPLC purification eliminates immune activation and improves translation of nucleoside-modified, protein-encoding mRNA, Nucleic Acids Res. source
The Results report that HPLC removed dsRNA contaminants from in vitro-transcribed RNA. Our copy does not report cellulose chromatography as a method for removing them, so it supports only the HPLC part of the cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [14] Baiersdörfer, 2019, A Facile Method for the Removal of dsRNA Contaminant from In Vitro-Transcribed mRNA, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study's results showed a difference in mRNA expression patterns, and this difference was consistent in all models.
“Altogether, these results showed a difference in mRNA expression patterns, and this difference was consistent in all models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: eGFP reporter mRNA expression results generalize to antigen-coding mRNA and mRNA vaccines.
- Rests on an assumption: In vitro cell lines and zebrafish models predict human mRNA vaccine performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 24 h post-transfection, 148A-mRNA provided the highest eGFP expression in HeLa cells by qualitative fluorescence microscopy, with the same transfection efficiency and cell viability for all assays.
“At 24 h post-transfection, qualitative fluorescence microscopy analysis showed that the 148A-mRNA provided the highest eGFP expression (Figure 2A) for the same transfection efficiency and cell viability for all assays (Figures S2A and S2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe eGFP expression level of the mRNAs tested is comparable between HeLa and DC2.4 cell lines, except for the L7601 commercial mRNA.
“The eGFP expression level of the mRNAs tested is comparable between HeLa and DC2.4 cell lines, except for the L7601 commercial mRNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, eGFP expression was significantly more important in primary cells transfected with UTR4 mRNA than with 148A and UTR2 mRNAs.
“As for HeLa and DC2.4 cell lines, the eGFP expression was significantly more important in primary cells transfected with UTR4 mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA low level of eGFP production is obtained with UTR2 and UTR5 mRNAs in both HeLa and DC2.4 cell lines, whereas UTR2 presented a higher eGFP expression in moDCs.
“Hence, a low level of eGFP production is obtained with UTR2 and UTR5 mRNAs in both cell lines (Figures 4 and 5), whereas UTR2 presented a higher eGFP expression in moDCs (Figures 6A and 6B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUTR4 allows a high level of eGFP expression in human and mouse cells as well as in vivo after intramuscular injection of adult zebrafish.
“Here, we have shown that UTR4 allows a high level of eGFP expression in human and mouse cells as well as in vivo after intramuscular injection of adult zebrafish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn HeLa cells, all poly(A) mRNAs showed similar eGFP expression kinetics, with maximal eGFP expression at 24 h post-transfection followed by a gradual decrease over time.
“A similar eGFP expression kinetic was observed with all the poly(A) mRNA, with a maximal eGFP expression at 24 h post-transfection followed by a gradual decrease of eGFP over time (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCombining dsRNA depletion and 5′PPP dephosphorylation produces a great synergic improvement in mRNA potency in DC2.4 cells and even more in human moDCs.
“From a more general view, our results demonstrated a great synergic improvement in mRNA potency by combining dsRNA depletion and 5′PPP dephosphorylation in our APC model, the DC2.4 cells, and even more in human moDCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSelection of high-ribosome loading 5′ UTR sequence is a promising tool to improve mRNA potency, although it is not always correlated with high protein expression.
“From this study, we showed that the selection of high-ribosome loading 5′ UTR sequence is a promising tool to improve mRNA potency, although it is not always correlated with high protein expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe poly(A) region contributes to translation efficiency, mRNA half-life, and therefore mRNA potency.
“The poly(A) is a critical region that contributes to translation efficiency, mRNA half-life, and therefore mRNA potency.19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Sachs, 1990, The role of poly(A) in the translation and stability of mRNA, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningdsRNA depletion and 5′PPP dephosphorylation of mRNA are important for vaccine purposes, since immune cells are more sensitive to PAMPs.
“This highlights the importance of dsRNA depletion and 5′PPP dephosphorylation of mRNA used for vaccine purposes, since immune cells are more sensitive to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Immune cells are more sensitive to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) than non-immune cells.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStrategies to impair pattern recognition receptor recognition of IVT mRNA include modified nucleosides, uridine depletion in the coding sequence, or dephosphorylation of 5′PPP mRNAs.
“Others strategies aim to impair the PRR recognition of IVT mRNA with the use of modified nucleosides,16 uridine depletion in the coding sequence,17 or dephosphorylation of 5′PPP mRNAs.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Karikó, 2005, Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA, Immunity source
- cites [17] Vaidyanathan, 2018, Uridine Depletion and Chemical Modification Increase Cas9 mRNA Activity and Reduce Immunogenicity without HPLC Purification, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
Queued — the background check reaches it, usually within a day.
- cites [18] Schmidt, 2009, 5′-triphosphate RNA requires base-paired structures to activate antiviral signaling via RIG-I, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
Queued — the background check reaches it, usually within a day.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData were determined as mean of three independent experiments, each including four technical replicates.
“Data were determined as mean of three independent experiments, each of them including four technical replicates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAfter cellulose chromatography and phosphatase treatment, dsRNA contaminants are depleted; thus the decrease of 5′PPP mRNA is beneficial for eGFP expression.
“After cellulose chromatography and phosphatase treatment, dsRNA contaminants are depleted; thus the decrease of 5′PPP mRNA is beneficial for eGFP expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTranslational efficiency of mRNA improves with increasing poly(A) size up to a length of 300 A.
“who showed that the translational efficiency of mRNA was improved in conjunction with increasing poly(A) size until a length of 300 A”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Grier et al.,10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [24] Nicholson, 2019, Tales of Detailed Poly(A) Tails, Trends Cell Biol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe enzymatic capping efficiency was validated by fluorescence microscopy after mRNA transfection into HeLa cells.
“The enzymatic capping efficiency was validated by fluorescence microscopy after mRNA transfection into HeLa cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe more pronounced effect of double purification in DCs may be due to higher expression of PRRs in DCs and their sensing capacity to contaminants.
“possibly because of the higher expression of PRRs into DCs and therefore their sensing capacity to contaminants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll plasmids were propagated with NEB stable competent E. coli cells, and sequences were checked by Sanger sequencing.
“All plasmids were propagated with NEB stable competent E. coli cells (NEB, France), and sequences were checked by Sanger sequencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUse of modified nucleosides such as methyl-pseudo uridine is a successful approach to avoid overactivation of innate immunity and increase translation of mRNA.
“For instance, a successful approach to avoid overactivation of the innate immunity and increase translation of mRNA is the use of modified nucleosides such as methyl-pseudo uridine.29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Karikó, 2008, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability, Mol. Ther. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenMFIs are represented as mean ± SD, and experimental values were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.
“MFIs are represented as the mean ± standard deviation of the mean (SD), and experimental values were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe procedures on adult zebrafish were conducted in accordance with European Union and French laws and approved by the local animal ethic committee.
“The procedures on adult zebrafish were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the European Union and French laws and approved by the local animal ethic committee under regulatory governmental authority (CECCAPP, Comité d’Evaluation Commun au Centre Léon Bérard, à l’Animalerie de transit de l’ENS, au PBES et au laboratoire P4 [no. C2EA15], APAFIS #16888-2018082321405041).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe threshold between eGFP-positive and eGFP-negative cells was defined so that >99.5% of non-transfected cells are considered not expressing eGFP.
“The threshold between eGFP-positive and eGFP-negative cells was defined so that >99.5% of non-transfected cells are considered not expressing eGFP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSpecific UTRs, such as one or two copies of the 3′ UTR of globin or a short 14-nucleotide 5′ UTR, increase the translational efficiency of mRNAs.
“numerous works have developed specific UTRs to increase the translational efficiency of mRNAs, as the use of one or two copies of the 3′ UTR of the globin or other known stable mRNA8,9 or short 14-nucleotide 5′ UTR.27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Orlandini von Niessen, 2019, Improving mRNA-Based Therapeutic Gene Delivery by Expression-Augmenting 3′ UTRs Identified by Cellular Library Screening, Mol. Ther. source
- cites [9] Holtkamp, 2006, Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells, Blood source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Trepotec, 2019, Maximizing the Translational Yield of mRNA Therapeutics by Minimizing 5′-UTRs, Tissue Eng. Part A source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationData were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test.
“Data were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Shapiro, 1965, An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples), Biometrika source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA comparable result had been previously observed after intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA into adult zebrafish, showing nucleic acid entering myocytes and antigen-presenting cells at the site of administration.
“A comparable result had been previously observed after intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA into adult zebrafish and showed the nucleic acid entering the cells (myocytes and antigen-presenting cells [APCs]) at the site of administration.28”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Myllymäki, 2018, Immunization of Adult Zebrafish for the Preclinical Screening of DNA-based Vaccines, J. Vis. Exp source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe dsRNA elimination was checked by dot-blotting.
“The dsRNA elimination was checked by dot-blotting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll analyzed mRNAs showed sharp bands by agarose gel electrophoresis, confirming their overall integrity.
“All these mRNAs were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the presence of sharp bands confirmed their overall integrity (Figure S8A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningActivation by dsRNA leads to detrimental strong innate immune activation, impairing the cellular translational machinery and therefore eGFP expression.
“Activation by dsRNA leads to a detrimental strong innate immune activation, impairing the cellular translational machinery, and therefore the eGFP expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The presence of uncapped mRNA and dsRNA are sources of innate immunity activation.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationContaminants such as dsRNA or 5′PPP uncapped mRNA activate pattern recognition receptors and block cellular protein synthesis.
“Indeed, those contaminants, such as dsRNA or to a lesser extent 5′PPP uncapped mRNA, activate PRRs and block the cellular protein synthesis.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Mu, 2018, An origin of the immunogenicity of in vitro transcribed RNA, Nucleic Acids Res. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPoly(A) tail plays an important function in the stability and regulation of translation efficiency of mRNA.
“Poly(A) tail plays an important function in the stability and regulation of translation efficiency of the mRNA.24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Nicholson, 2019, Tales of Detailed Poly(A) Tails, Trends Cell Biol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA high capping efficiency in the adequate Cap-1 conformation evades host responses by IFIT family members and favors mRNA translation.
“Indeed, a high capping efficiency in the adequate Cap-1 conformation evades host responses by interferon (IFN)-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats (IFIT) family members and favors mRNA translation.23”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Kumar, 2014, Inhibition of translation by IFIT family members is determined by their ability to interact selectively with the 5′-terminal regions of cap0-, cap1- and 5’ppp- mRNAs, Nucleic Acids Res. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
The paper relies on this without support.
Increasing mRNA expression or potency will allow decreasing the therapeutic dose and reactogenicity.
“Intending to increase the potency of mRNA therapeutics and to decrease the therapeutic dose, we designed a mRNA backbone and optimized the mRNA purification process.”
The paper relies on this without support.
eGFP reporter mRNA expression results generalize to antigen-coding mRNA and mRNA vaccines.
“We used the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) reporter gene flanked by one 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and two 3′ UTRs of the human β-globin as a reference mRNA”
The paper relies on this without support.
In vitro cell lines and zebrafish models predict human mRNA vaccine performance.
“Those results were then confirmed in vivo with the embryonic zebrafish model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The poly(A) tail has been limited to 120 units because of its instability during bacterial plasmid production.
“However, because of its instability during bacterial plasmid production, the poly(A) tail has been limited to 120 units.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The presence of uncapped mRNA and dsRNA are sources of innate immunity activation.
“However, other factors like the presence of uncapped mRNA and dsRNA are still a source of innate immunity activation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Immune cells are more sensitive to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) than non-immune cells.
“since immune cells are more sensitive to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The synthetic 5′ UTR UTR4 allows strong expression of mRNA in cells and Zebrafish.
“the synthetic 5′ UTR UTR4 allowing strong expression of mRNA in cells and Zebrafish27”
From Evaluation of synthetic mRNA with selected UTR sequences and alternative poly(A) tail, in vitro and in vivo (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
moDC measurement time differs between results and Figure 6 caption
MinorThe results say moDC eGFP expression was evaluated 72 hours after transfection, but the Figure 6 caption lists measurements at 24, 48, and 96 hours, with no 72-hour measurement.
“the eGFP expression was evaluated by flow cytometry 72 h after transfection (Figures 6A and 6B).”
“The measurements were acquired at 24, 48, and 96 h post-transfection”
Cites
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480 · see citing works
mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W., & Weissman, D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · Cited by 4,667 · see citing works
An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report
Jackson, L. A., Anderson, E. J., Rouphael, N. G., Roberts, P. C., Makhene, M., Coler, R. N., McCullough, M. P., Chappell, J. D., Denison, M. R., Stevens, L. J., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2022483 · Cited by 3,237 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Buckstein, M., Ni, H., & Weissman, D. (2005) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008 · Cited by 2,728 · see citing works
IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL CELL TYPE IN PERIPHERAL LYMPHOID ORGANS OF MICE
Steinman, R. M., & Cohn, Z. A. (1973) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.137.5.1142 · Cited by 2,443 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Muramatsu, H., Welsh, F. A., Ludwig, J., Kato, H., Akira, S., & Weissman, D. (2008) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2008.200 · Cited by 1,930 · see citing works
Mulligan, M. J., Lyke, K. E., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Neuzil, K., Raabe, V., Bailey, R., Swanson, K. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.30.20142570 · Cited by 1,569 · see citing works
Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis
White, R. M., Sessa, A., Burke, C., Bowman, T., LeBlanc, J., Ceol, C., Bourque, C., Dovey, M., Goessling, W., Burns, C. E., et al. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Muramatsu, H., Ludwig, J., & Weissman, D. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr695 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Holtkamp, S., Kreiter, S., Selmi, A., Simon, P., Koslowski, M., Huber, C., Türeci, O., & Sahin, U. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-04-015024 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
A facile method for the removal of dsRNA contaminant from in vitro-transcribed mRNA
Baiersdörfer, M., Boros, G., Muramatsu, H., Mahiny, A., Vlatkovic, I., Sahin, U., & Karikó, K. (2019) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2019.02.018 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay
Sample, P. J., Wang, B., Reid, D. W., Presnyak, V., McFadyen, I. J., Morris, D. R., & Seelig, G. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0164-5 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
5′-triphosphate RNA requires base-paired structures to activate antiviral signaling via RIG-I
Schmidt, A., Schwerd, T., Hamm, W., Hellmuth, J. C., Cui, S., Wenzel, M., Hoffmann, F. S., Michallet, M.-C., Besch, R., Hopfner, K.-P., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900971106 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Tailoring mRNA Vaccine to Balance Innate/Adaptive Immune Response
Linares-Fernández, S., Lacroix, C., Exposito, J.-Y., & Verrier, B. (2020) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2019.10.002 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Self-citationOrlandini von Niessen, A. G., Poleganov, M. A., Rechner, C., Plaschke, A., Kranz, L. M., Fesser, S., Diken, M., Löwer, M., Vallazza, B., Beissert, T., et al. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.12.011 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
(1995) · PubMed · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Elimination of large tumors in mice by mRNA-encoded bispecific antibodies
Stadler, C. R., Bähr-Mahmud, H., Celik, L., Hebich, B., Roth, A. S., Roth, R. P., Karikó, K., Türeci, Ö., & Sahin, U. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4356 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Vaidyanathan, S., Azizian, K. T., Haque, A. K. M. A., Henderson, J. M., Hendel, A., Shore, S., Antony, J. S., Hogrefe, R. I., Kormann, M. S. D., Porteus, M. H., et al. (2018) · Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2018.06.010 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
An origin of the immunogenicity of in vitro transcribed RNA
Mu, X., Greenwald, E., Ahmad, S., & Hur, S. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky177 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Kumar, P., Sweeney, T. R., Skabkin, M. A., Skabkina, O. V., Hellen, C. U. T., & Pestova, T. V. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1321 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Tales of Detailed Poly(A) Tails
Nicholson, A. L., & Pasquinelli, A. E. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.11.002 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Coolen, A.-L., Lacroix, C., Mercier‐Gouy, P., Delaune, E. A., Monge, C., Exposito, J., & Verrier, B. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.12.019 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of poly(A) in the translation and stability of mRNA
Sachs, A. (1990) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/0955-0674(90)90161-7 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Synthesis of low immunogenicity RNA with high-temperature in vitro transcription
Wu, M. Z., Asahara, H., Tzertzinis, G., & Roy, B. (2020) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.073858.119 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Trepotec, Z., Geiger, J., Plank, C., Aneja, M. K., & Rudolph, C. (2019) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.069286.118 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The Relationship between Eukaryotic Translation and mRNA Stability
Oliveira, C. C., & McCarthy, J. E. G. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.15.8936 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Falcone, D. L., & Andrews, D. W. (1991) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.11.5.2656 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
pEVL: A Linear Plasmid for Generating mRNA IVT Templates With Extended Encoded Poly(A) Sequences
Grier, A. E., Burleigh, S., Sahni, J., Clough, C. A., Cardot, V., Choe, D. C., Krutein, M. C., Rawlings, D. J., Jensen, M. C., Scharenberg, A. M., et al. (2016) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2016.21 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Maximizing the Translational Yield of mRNA Therapeutics by Minimizing 5′-UTRs
Trepotec, Z., Aneja, M. K., Geiger, J., Hasenpusch, G., Plank, C., & Rudolph, C. (2019) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0485 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Design, Assembly, Production, and Transfection of Synthetic Modified mRNA
Oh, S., & Kessler, J. A. (2018) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.10.008 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Ferizi, M., Aneja, M. K., Balmayor, E. R., Badieyan, Z. S., Mykhaylyk, O. M., Rudolph, C., & Plank, C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39149 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Immunization of Adult Zebrafish for the Preclinical Screening of DNA-based Vaccines
Myllymäki, H., Niskanen, M., Oksanen, K., & Rämet, M. (2018) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/58453 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fever, aches from Pfizer, Moderna jabs aren’t dangerous but may be intense for some
Wadman, M. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf7805 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Immunization of Adult Zebrafish for the Preclinical Screening of DNA-based Vaccines
Myllymäki, H., Niskanen, M., Oksanen, K. E., & Rämet, M. (2018) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/58453-v · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Falcone, D., & Andrews, D. W. (1991) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.11.5.2656-2664.1991
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The immunostimulatory nature of mRNA lipid nanoparticles
Sharma, P., Hoorn, D., Aitha, A., Breier, D., & Peer, D. (2024) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.115175 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Revolutionizing immunization: a comprehensive review of mRNA vaccine technology and applications
Leong, K. Y., Tham, S. K., & Poh, C. L. (2025) · Virology Journal · doi:10.1186/s12985-025-02645-6 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Machine Learning for Designing Next-Generation mRNA Therapeutics
Castillo-Hair, S. M., & Seelig, G. (2021) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00621 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Kamiya, M., Matsumoto, M., Yamashita, K., Izumi, T., Kawaguchi, M., Mizukami, S., Tsurumaru, M., Mukai, H., & Kawakami, S. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14112357 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Advancements of in vitro transcribed mRNA (IVT mRNA) to enable translation into the clinics
Kang, D. D., Li, H., & Dong, Y. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.114961 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Optimizing 5’UTRs for mRNA-delivered gene editing using deep learning
Castillo-Hair, S., Fedak, S., Wang, B., Linder, J., Havens, K., Certo, M., & Seelig, G. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49508-2 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A flexible, thermostable nanostructured lipid carrier platform for RNA vaccine delivery
Gerhardt, A., Voigt, E. A., Archer, M. C., Reed, S., Larson, E., Hoeven, N. V., Kramer, R. M., Fox, C. B., & Casper, C. (2022) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2022.03.009 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
mRNA vaccines: the most recent clinical applications of synthetic mRNA
Kwon, S., Kwon, M., Im, S., Lee, K., & Lee, H. (2022) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-022-01381-7 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
The mRNA Vaccine Revolution: COVID-19 Has Launched the Future of Vaccinology
Ye, Z., Harmon, J., Ni, W., Li, Y., Wich, D., & Xu, Q. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c12584 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Understanding the impact of in vitro transcription byproducts and contaminants
Lenk, R., Kleindienst, W., Szabó, G. T., Baiersdörfer, M., Boros, G., Keller, J. M., Mahiny, A. J., & Vlatkovic, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2024.1426129 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
mRNA vaccines in the prevention and treatment of diseases
Gu, Y., Duan, J., Yang, N., Yang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2022) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.167 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Advances in the design and delivery of RNA vaccines for infectious diseases
Lokras, A. G., Bobak, T. R., Baghel, S. S., Sebastiani, F., & Foged, C. (2024) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2024.115419 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Immunotherapeutic treatment of lung cancer and bone metastasis with a mPLA/mRNA tumor vaccine
Ma, S., Li, X., Mai, Y., Guo, J., Zuo, W., & Yang, J. (2023) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.059 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
In Vitro Transcribed RNA-Based Platform Vaccines: Past, Present, and Future
Perenkov, A. D., Sergeeva, A. D., Vedunova, M. V., & Krysko, D. V. (2023) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines11101600 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Ma, X., Liu, S., Fan, B., Jin, D., Miao, L., Liu, L., Du, S., & Lin, J. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102485 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, M., Wang, Z., Xie, C., & Xia, X. (2022) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.04.011 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Development of an LNP-Encapsulated mRNA-RBD Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 and Its Variants
Liu, C., Rcheulishvili, N., Shen, Z., Papukashvili, D., Xie, F., Wang, Z., Wang, X., He, Y., & Wang, P. G. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14051101 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
mRNA Vaccine Platform: mRNA Production and Delivery
Litvinova, V. R., Рудометов, А. П., Карпенко, Л. И., & Ilyichev, A. A. (2023) · Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1134/s1068162023020152 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The Zebrafish Embryo as a Model Organism for Testing mRNA-Based Therapeutics
Bondue, T., Berlingerio, S. P., van den Heuvel, L. P., & Levtchenko, E. N. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241311224 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Messenger RNA-encoded antibody approach for targeting extracellular and intracellular tau
Wongsodirdjo, P., Caruso, A. C., Yong, A., Lester, M. A., Vella, L. J., Hung, Y. H., & Nisbet, R. M. (2024) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae100 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Medjmedj, A., Genon, H., Hezili, D., Loth, A. N., Clemençon, R., Guimpied, C., Mollet, L., Bigot, A., Wien, F., Hamacek, J., et al. (2025) · Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102648 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Optimal Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-mRNA for Transient CAR T Cell Generation
Kitte, R., Serfling, R., Blache, U., Seitz, C., Schrader, S., Koehl, U., Fricke, S., Bär, C., & Tretbar, S. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26030965 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Siew, Y.-Y., & Zhang, W. Y. (2024) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465576 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Guo, X., Liu, D., Huang, Y., Deng, Y., Wang, Y., Mao, J., Zhou, Y., Xiong, Y., & Gao, X. (2023) · Virology Journal · doi:10.1186/s12985-023-02023-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Delehedde, C., Ciganek, I., Bernard, P.-L., Laroui, N., Silva, C. C. D., Gonçalves, C., Nunès, J. A., Griscelli, A. B., Imeri, J., Huyghe, M., et al. (2024) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102263 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Implementation of mRNA–Lipid Nanoparticle Technology in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar)
Dahl, L. O. S., Hak, S., Braaen, S., Molska, A., Rodà, F., Parot, J., Wessel, Ø., Fosse, J. H., Bjørgen, H., Borgos, S. E., et al. (2024) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines12070788 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
UTR-Insight: integrating deep learning for efficient 5′ UTR discovery and design
Pan, S., Wang, H., Zhang, H., Tang, Z., Xu, L., Yan, Z., & Hu, Y. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11269-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Wei, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, X., Xue, Y., Dang, S., & Zhai, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1524317 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Combes, F., Pettersson, F. J., Thanh-Huong, B., Molska, A., Komissarov, A., Parot, J., & Borgos, S. E. (2024) · RNA Biology · doi:10.1080/15476286.2024.2321764 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Research progress of mosquito-borne virus mRNA vaccines
Sun, N., Su, Z., & Zheng, X. (2024) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101398 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
An LNP-mRNA vaccine protects fish against rhabdovirus infection
Ayad, C., Porter, D., Lambert, E., Libeau, P., Coiffier, C., Ginet, V., Collet, B., Levraud, J., Boudinot, P., & Verrier, B. (2025) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126957 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationSokhangouy, S. K., Behzadi, M., Rezaei, S., Farjami, M., Haghshenas, M., Sefidbakht, Y., & Mozaffari‐Jovin, S. (2025) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.202400596 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Selection of UTRs in mRNA-Based Gene Therapy and Vaccines
Volkhin, I. A., Paremskaia, A. I., Dashian, M. A., Smeshnova, D. S., Pavlov, R. E., Mityaeva, O. N., Volchkov, P. Y., & Deviatkin, A. A. (2025) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297924604659 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Shen, Z., Zhang, S., Jiang, Q., Liu, N., Li, F., Gao, Z., Pan, S., Hao, W., Deng, Q., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.29062 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lipid nanoparticle-delivered intrabodies for inhibiting necroptosis and pyroptosis
Deepagan, V. G., Ma, X., Bazregari, F., Pang, J., Schaefer, J., Hildebrand, J. M., Dempsey, R. K., Doerflinger, M., Baldwin, C. A., Schmidt, F. I., et al. (2025) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20253191 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Solodushko, V., Kim, J. H., & Fouty, B. (2025) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41434-025-00521-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Muzard, C., Séguin, J., Bonnefoy, J., Salkini, N., Serra, V. A., Alhareth, K., Lemdani, K., & Mignet, N. (2025) · In vitro models · doi:10.1007/s44164-025-00096-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Li, C., Liu, Y., Liao, R., He, D., Xu, L., Chen, T., Xiao, Q., Luo, M., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.05.024 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Capillary-Mediated Vitrification: Preservation of mRNA at Elevated Temperatures
Renu, S., Shank-Retzlaff, M. L., Sharpe, J., Bronsart, L. L., & Mohanty, P. (2022) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-022-00723-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Machine learning-based analysis of the impact of 5′ untranslated region on protein expression
Wang, L., Liu, S., Huang, J.-X., Zhu, H., Li, S., Li, Y., Chen, S., Han, J., Zhu, Y., Wu, J., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf861 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Heendeniya, S. N., Chen, S., Bhatti, S. H., Zahra, Q. U. A., Rahimizadeh, K., Poudel, B. H., Wilton, S. D., & Veedu, R. N. (2025) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.3389/ebm.2025.10784 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The current landscape of mRNA therapy and the strategies for mRNA purification and dsRNA removal
Liu, J., Zang, J., Jing-Ru, X., Ran, X., Su, M., Zhang, W.-M., Ge, Z.-W., Sun, Q.-Y., & Ding, L. (2026) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-026-01277-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
mRNA-Vaccine Platform: Features of Obtaining and Delivery of mRNA
Litvinova, V. R., Рудометов, А. П., Карпенко, Л. И., & Ilyichev, A. A. (2023) · Биоорганическая химия · doi:10.31857/s013234232302015x · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Cui, J., Qiaerxie, G., Qin, H., Long, F., Wang, X., Zhixin, Y., Du, P., & Cui, Y. (2023) · Archives of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.29328/journal.apps.1001038 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tailoring mRNA lipid nanoparticles for antifungal vaccines
Li, Y., Meagher, R. B., & Lin, X. (2025) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1013091 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
mRNA based in vivo MG1113 antibody production as a potential therapeutic approach for hemophilia
Oh, M., Jeong, Y., Jung, H., Byeon, Y., Kwak, H., Kim, S., Seo, W., Jung, J., & Lee, H. (2025) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114520 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
N1MΨU-modified mRNA vaccines break the mold in fish by enhancing innate immune activation
Porter, D., Jouneau, L., Peruzzi, M., Collet, B., Verrier, B., & Boudinot, P. (2026) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102862 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationTheocharidis, G., & Li, J. (2024) · Contemporary diabetes · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55715-6_15 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kriachkov, V. A., Hui, J. C. W., Lancaster, J., Vespasiani, D. M., Denny, N., Hamley, J. C., Gubbels, L., Bandala‐Sanchez, E., Neeland, M. R., Levi, E., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.01.708923 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
mRNA based vaccines as an alternative to conventional vaccine approaches
Zubda-tul, H., & Muhammad, Q. (2022) · Open Journal of Environmental Biology · doi:10.17352/ojeb.000026
Immune Responses to mRNA Vaccine
Exposito, J., Monge, C., Arruda, D. C., & Verrier, B. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527838394.ch2
Self-citationThe strategies and advances of mRNA translation booster
Shi, Y., Sun, K., Hu, Y., Lou, Z., Wang, Y., & You, J. (2025) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2025.101090
In Vitro Transcription (IVT) Reaction – The Gateway to New Therapeutic Modalities
(2025) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-7208-5
Che, S., Li, Z., Su, Z., Li, Z., Yu, A., Liu, M., & Zhang, S. (2026) · CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS (CHINESE VERSION) · doi:10.1016/s1872-2067(25)64860-1
Nam, Y., Shin, S. C., Cho, S. W., & Ahn, H. J. (2026) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18020164
Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Li, X., Yang, T., Zhao, Y., Li, K., Zhao, J., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8569117/v1
Krog, T. F., Haukland, I. S., & Haugland, G. T. (2026) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines14050367
A single-nucleotide change in the Kozak sequence enhances protein expressionPreprint
Knol, R. A., Fariaby, T., de Vlieger, E. A., Kros, A., & Slütter, B. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.20.726450
Aschmann, D., Knol, R. A., Verbeet, W., Wijngaarden, S., Escalona-Rayo, O., Freire, R. V. M., Bertram, K., Tekkali, I., Bunzel, G., Fontein, B., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.05.730351
Principles, Optimization, Applications, and Future Prospects of mRNA Vaccine Technology
Qin, L., Yang, J., Hu, Y., Li, Q., Guo, T., Tang, J., & Zhao, W. (2026) · SynBio · doi:10.3390/synbio4040021
- Authors
- Linares-Fernández, S., Moreno, J., Lambert, E., Mercier-Gouy, P., Vachez, L., Verrier, B., & Exposito, J.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Verrier, Bernard
- Exposito, Jean-Yves
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 945-956
- ISSN
- 2162-2531 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8523304
- OpenAlex
- W3205624390
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR-16-CE20-0002-01 554)
- Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales (ECTZ 119388)
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- mRNA vaccines, mRNA purification, poly(A) tail length, 5' untranslated region, 3' untranslated region, mRNA capping, in vitro transcribed mRNA, EGFP reporter, ribosome loading, transfection efficiency, reactogenicity, SARS-CoV-2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-05.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review