Examining changes in HRV and emotion following artmaking with three different art materials
Abstract
This protocol enables the examination of psychological and physiological responses to different types of behavioral engagements. Specifically, in this study example, the emotional response and changes in heart rate variability are examined in response to artmaking with three different art materials that vary in their levels of fluidity. This protocol can be adapted to examine other types of behavior or engagement in artmaking with other materials. There are several benefits to using this protocol. Firstly, the order randomization of the materials improves the probability that the response measured is associated with its qualities and not the order of presentation. Secondly, the continuous measuring of electrocardiogram enables the examination of changes in heart rate variability after engagement with each art material and changes that might occur during the artmaking itself. The advantages of this protocol should be considered with their limitations. The music listening is before each art making session; thus, the return to baseline can only be measured in the first two conditions. The return to baseline provides information on how fast individuals recover after response to working with each of the materials. Furthermore, a more liquid material instead of gouache paint with a brush, such as finger paints, provides more difference between materials. Finally, this protocol can be adapted to specific research needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The link between vagus nerve activity and the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (HRV) correlating with vagal tone has been well established.
“The link between vagus nerve activity and the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (HRV) correlating with vagal tone has been well established by Czamanski-Cohen et al. (2020).”
From A theoretical exploration of polyvagal theory in creative arts and psychomotor therapies for emotion regulation in stress and trauma (2024) · cites this paper as Czamanski-Cohen et al. (2020)
Cites
The expressive therapies continuum
Kagin, S. L., & Lusebrink, V. B. (1978) · Art Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/0090-9092(78)90031-5 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haeyen, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382007 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Czamanski-Cohen, J., Galili, G., & Allen, J. J. B.
- Affiliations
- Open University of Israel (IL)
- University of Arizona (US)
- ORCID
- Allen, John J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Visualized Experiments
- Publisher
- MyJove Corporation
- Published
- 2020-01-11
- Issue
- 155
- ISSN
- 1940-087X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000109674
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- heart rate variability, emotions, artmaking, art materials, fluidity, electrocardiogram, brush painting, music listening, physiological responses, psychological reactions, behavioral engagement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Art, Electrocardiography, Emotions, Heart Rate, Humans, Rest, Self-Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review