Cited by 4Art Therapy and Mental HealthAesthetic Perception and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Examining changes in HRV and emotion following artmaking with three different art materials

Czamanski-Cohen, Johanna, Galili, Giora, Allen, John J. B.·2020·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

This protocol enables the examination of psychological and physiological responses to different types of behavioral engagements. Specifically, in this study example, the emotional response and changes in heart rate variability are examined in response to artmaking with three different art materials that vary in their levels of fluidity. This protocol can be adapted to examine other types of behavior or engagement in artmaking with other materials. There are several benefits to using this protocol. Firstly, the order randomization of the materials improves the probability that the response measured is associated with its qualities and not the order of presentation. Secondly, the continuous measuring of electrocardiogram enables the examination of changes in heart rate variability after engagement with each art material and changes that might occur during the artmaking itself. The advantages of this protocol should be considered with their limitations. The music listening is before each art making session; thus, the return to baseline can only be measured in the first two conditions. The return to baseline provides information on how fast individuals recover after response to working with each of the materials. Furthermore, a more liquid material instead of gouache paint with a brush, such as finger paints, provides more difference between materials. Finally, this protocol can be adapted to specific research needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/60376

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Czamanski-Cohen, J., Galili, G., & Allen, J. J. B.
Affiliations
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2020-01-11
Issue
155
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000109674
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
heart rate variability, emotions, artmaking, art materials, fluidity, electrocardiogram, brush painting, music listening, physiological responses, psychological reactions, behavioral engagement
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Art, Electrocardiography, Emotions, Heart Rate, Humans, Rest, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review