Cited by 194Art Therapy and Mental HealthAesthetic Perception and AnalysisCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

The expressive therapies continuum

Kagin, Sandra L, Lusebrink, Vija B.·1978·Art Psychotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0090-9092(78)90031-5

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kagin, S. L., & Lusebrink, V. B.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Venue
Art Psychotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
171-180
ISSN
0090-9092 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003947030
Cited by
194
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Art Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
art therapy, artistic creation, EEG, brain activity, clay, pencils, art materials, delta oscillations, alpha activity, beta activity, relaxation, parietal lobe, frontal lobe, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review