Cited by 13Rare-earth and actinide compoundsPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismRadioactive element chemistry and processing

Comparison of Two Different Synthesis Methods of Single Crystals of Superconducting Uranium Ditelluride

Open access
Ran, Sheng, Liu, I-Lin, Saha, Shanta R., Saraf, Prathum, Paglione, Johnpierre, Butch, Nicholas P.·2021·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

Single crystal specimens of the actinide compound uranium ditelluride, UTe2, are of great importance to the study and characterization of its dramatic unconventional superconductivity, believed to entail spin-triplet electron pairing. A variety in the superconducting properties of UTe2 reported in the literature indicates that discrepancies between synthesis methods yield crystals with different superconducting properties, including the absence of superconductivity entirely. This protocol describes a process to synthesize crystals that exhibit superconductivity via chemical vapor transport, which has consistently exhibited a superconducting critical temperature of 1.6 K and a double transition indicative of a multi-component order parameter. This is compared to a second protocol that is used to synthesize crystals via the molten metal flux growth technique, which produces samples that are not bulk superconductors. Differences in the crystal properties are revealed through a comparison of structural, chemical, and electronic property measurements, showing that the most dramatic disparity occurs in the low-temperature electrical resistance of the samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/62563

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UTe2 crystals with no SC1 transition usually have RRR ≲ 5, which implies a high degree of disorder.

    “UTe2 crystals with no SC1 transition usually have a RRR ≲ 5, which implies a high degree of disorder33,34.”

    From Orphan high field superconductivity in non-superconducting uranium ditelluride (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Representative Results report that a flux-grown UTe2 sample did not superconduct, had an RRR of approximately 2, and had more crystallographic impurities or defects than the superconducting sample. The paper does not establish that crystals lacking the SC1 transition usually have RRR ≲ 5; its reported value concerns the flux-grown sample, not a general threshold. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Sau JD, Tewari S Topologically protected surface majorana arcs and bulk weyl fermions in ferromagnetic superconductors. Physical Review B. 86 (10), 104509 (2012).
  2. [2]Fu L, Kane CL Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Physical Review Letters. 100 (9), 096407 (2008). 18352737
  3. [3]Ran S Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity. Science. 365 (6454), 684– 687 (2019). 31416960
  4. [4]Hayes IM Weyl Superconductivity in UTe2. arXiv. 2002.02539 (2020). · arXiv
  5. [5]Jiao L Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe2. Nature. 579, 523 (2020). 32214254
  6. [6]Ran S Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductivity. Nature Physics. 15, 1250– 1254 (2019). PMC8201648 34131432
  7. [7]Aoki D Unconventional superconductivity in heavy fermion UTe2. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 88, 043702 (2019).
  8. [8]Cairnsm LP, Stevensm CR, O’Neill CD, Huxley A Composition dependence of the superconducting properties of UTe2. Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter: An Institute of Physics Journal. 32 (41), 415602 (2020). 32531764
  9. [9]Thomas SM Evidence for a pressure-induced antiferromagnetic quantum critical point in mixed valence UTe2. Science Advances. 6 (42), eabc8709 (2020). 33055167 PMC7556831
  10. [10]Hutanu V Low-temperature crystal structure of the unconventional spin-triplet superconductor UTe2 from single-crystal neutron diffraction. Acta Crystallographica Section B, Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials. 76 (Pt 1), 137– 143 (2020). PMC8202135 32831248
  11. [11]Sundar S Coexistence of ferromagnetic fluctuations and superconductivity in the actinide superconductor UTe2,” Physical Review B. 100, 140502(R) (2019). PMC8201662 34131607
  12. [12]Metz T Point-node gap structure of the spin-triplet superconductor UTe2. Physical Review B. 100, 220504(R) (2019). PMC8204512 34136735
  13. [14]Braithwaite D Multiple superconducting phases in a nearly ferromagnetic system. Communications Physics. 2, 147 (2019).
  14. [15]Ran S Enhancement and reentrance of spin triplet superconductivity in UTe2 under pressure. Physical Review B. 101, 140503(R) (2020). PMC8201659 34131608
  15. [16]Nakamine G Superconducting properties of heavy fermion UTe2 revealed by 125Te-nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 88, 113703 (2020).
  16. [17]Miao L Low energy band structure and symmetries of UTe2 from angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Physical Review Letters. 124, 076401 (2020). 32142327
  17. [18]Lin W-C Tuning magnetic confinement of spin-triplet superconductivity. npj Quantum Materials. 5, 68 (2020).
  18. [19]Bae S Anomalous normal fluid response in a chiral superconductor. arXiv. 1909.09032 (2019). PMC8113495 33976162 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ran, S., Liu, I.-L., Saha, S. R., Saraf, P., Paglione, J., & Butch, N. P.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Maryland Quantum Materials Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2021-07-08
Issue
173
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177664958
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0019154)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF9071)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Rare-earth and actinide compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
UTe2, single crystal growth, chemical vapor transport, unconventional superconductivity, spin-triplet pairing, superconducting critical temperature, low-temperature resistivity
MeSH terms
Superconductivity, Electrons, Temperature, Uranium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review