The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bridging theory and practice in teacher education: teaching schools – a bridge too far?
Open accessAbstract
The study reported on in this article stems from the Integrated Strategic Planning Framework for Teacher Education and Development in South Africa (2011). This framework proposes the establishment of teaching schools to strengthen teacher education. This article reports on a qualitative inquiry into the views of school-based personnel and the teacher education sector on the implementation of teaching schools as sites for teacher education and whether they think teaching schools could enhance the education of student-teachers. The inquiry showed that the participants were positive that teaching schools will enhance teacher education through serving as a bridge between the academic, university-based preparation of student-teachers and the practice demands of the teaching profession. However, they had no clear notion of how such schools could add value to teacher preparation differentiated to schools in which student-teachers are placed for work-integrated learning. We contend that, prior to establishing teaching schools, much deliberation between all stakeholders is required about the purpose and means of integrating teaching schools in teacher education. If not, teaching schools that serve to bridge the gap between the education of student-teachers at universities and the demands that novice teachers face once they enter the teaching profession might remain an elusive ideal.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although pre-service teachers may get ample opportunities to observe and teach lessons when supervising teachers are absent, experience alone does not guarantee that students will or can access the rationale that underpins teaching choices in action.
“Although preservice teachers may get ample opportunities to observe and teach lessons when supervising teachers are absent, experience alone does not guarantee that students will or can access the rationale that underpins teaching choices in action (see Gravett & Ramsaroop, 2015;Gravett et al., 2011;Reeves & Robinson, 2014).”
From Conceptualising work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers' pedagogic reasoning (2021) · cites this paper as Gravett & Ramsaroop, 2015
Citations
Cites
Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167272 · Cited by 2,288 · cited 6×
“Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1999) also dispute the theory-into-practice relationship.”
BackgroundInfluentialCrossing the “Theory-practice Divide”: Learning to Be(come) a Teacher
Gravett, S. (2012) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v2i2.9 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualising work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers' pedagogic reasoning
RusznyakI, L., & Bertram, C. (2021) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i83a02 · Cited by 33
“…may get ample opportunities to observe and teach lessons when supervising teachers are absent, experience alone does not guarantee that students will or can access the rationale that underpins teaching choices in action (see Gravett & Ramsaroop, 2015; Gravett et al., 2011; Reeves & Robinson, 2014).”
BackgroundMentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers
Msimango, N., Fonseca, K., & Petersen, N. (2020) · Perspectives in Education · doi:10.18820/2519593x/pie.v38.i2.18 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Gravett, S., & Ramsaroop, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- Venue
- Perspectives in Education
- Publisher
- University of the Free State
- Published
- 2015-03-31
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 0258-2236 (ISSN-L)
- 2519-593X
- OpenAlex
- W1856631196
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Perspectives in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Perspectives in Education (cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Department of Higher Education and Training
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- teaching schools, teacher professional development, theory-practice gap, pre-service teachers, work-integrated learning, university-school partnership, stakeholder perspectives, novice teachers, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review