Cited by 30Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and AssessmentsEducation Pedagogy and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bridging theory and practice in teacher education: teaching schools – a bridge too far?

Open access
Gravett, Sarah, Ramsaroop, Sarita·2015·Perspectives in Education

Abstract

The study reported on in this article stems from the Integrated Strategic Planning Framework for Teacher Education and Development in South Africa (2011). This framework proposes the establishment of teaching schools to strengthen teacher education. This article reports on a qualitative inquiry into the views of school-based personnel and the teacher education sector on the implementation of teaching schools as sites for teacher education and whether they think teaching schools could enhance the education of student-teachers. The inquiry showed that the participants were positive that teaching schools will enhance teacher education through serving as a bridge between the academic, university-based preparation of student-teachers and the practice demands of the teaching profession. However, they had no clear notion of how such schools could add value to teacher preparation differentiated to schools in which student-teachers are placed for work-integrated learning. We contend that, prior to establishing teaching schools, much deliberation between all stakeholders is required about the purpose and means of integrating teaching schools in teacher education. If not, teaching schools that serve to bridge the gap between the education of student-teachers at universities and the demands that novice teachers face once they enter the teaching profession might remain an elusive ideal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38140/pie.v33i1.1901

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although pre-service teachers may get ample opportunities to observe and teach lessons when supervising teachers are absent, experience alone does not guarantee that students will or can access the rationale that underpins teaching choices in action.

    “Although preservice teachers may get ample opportunities to observe and teach lessons when supervising teachers are absent, experience alone does not guarantee that students will or can access the rationale that underpins teaching choices in action (see Gravett & Ramsaroop, 2015;Gravett et al., 2011;Reeves & Robinson, 2014).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gravett, S., & Ramsaroop, S.
Affiliations
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Venue
Perspectives in Education
Published
2015-03-31
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
131-146
ISSN
  • 0258-2236 (ISSN-L)
  • 2519-593X
OpenAlex
W1856631196
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Perspectives in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Perspectives in Education (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Department of Higher Education and Training
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
teaching schools, teacher professional development, theory-practice gap, pre-service teachers, work-integrated learning, university-school partnership, stakeholder perspectives, novice teachers, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review