The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meat Spoilage Mechanisms and Preservation Techniques: A Critical Review
Open accessAbstract
Problem statement: Extremely perishable meat provides favorable growth condition for various microorganisms.Meat is also very much susceptible to spoilage due to chemical and enzymatic activities.The breakdown of fat, protein and carbohydrates of meat results in the development of off-odors, off-flavor and slim formation which make the meat objectionable for human consumption.It is, therefore, necessary to control meat spoilage in order to increase its shelf life and maintain its nutritional value, texture and flavor.Approach: A comprehensive literature review was performed on the spoliage mechanisms of meat and meat products and preservation techniques.Results: Historical data reveals that salting, drying, smoking, fermentation and canning were the traditional methods used to prevent meat spoilage and extend its shelf life.However, in order to prevent wholesomeness, appearance, composition, tenderness, flavor, juiciness, and nutritive value, new methods were developed.These included: cooling, freezing and chemical preservation.Wide range of physical and chemical reactions and actions of microorganisms or enzymes are responsible for the meat spoilage.Microbial growth, oxidation and enzymatic autolysis are three basic mechanisms responsible for spoilage of meat.Microbial growth and metabolism depends on various factors including: pre-slaughter husbandry practices, age of the animal at the time of slaughtering, handling during slaughtering, evisceration and processing, temperature controls during slaughtering, processing and distribution, preservation methods, type of packaging and handling and storage by consumer.Microbial spoilage causes pH change, slime formation, structural components degradation, off odors and appearance change.Autoxidation of lipids and the production of free radicals are natural processes which affect fatty acids and lead to oxidative deterioration of meat and off-flavour development.Lipid hydrolysis can take place enzymatically or non-enzymatically in meat.In muscle cells of slaughtered animals, enzymatic actions are taken place naturally and they act as catalysts for chemical reactions that finally end up in meat self deterioration.Softening and greenish discoloration of the meat results due to tissues degradation of the complex compounds (carbohydrates, fats and protein) in the autolysis process.Conclusion: Microbial, chemical and enzymatic activities can be controlled by low temperature storage and chemical techniques in the industry.Proper handling, pretreatment and preservation techniques can improve the quality of meat and meat products and increase their shelf life.Combination of chemical additives (TBHQ and ascorbic acid) and low temperature storage (5°C) in darkness are well recognized techniques for controlling the spoilage (microbial, enzymatic and oxidative) of meat and meat products.Understanding of the intrinsic factors and extrinsic factors at every meat processing stage (from preslaughtering to meat product development) is necessary before developing proper handling, pretreatment and preservation techniques for meat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 · Cited by 9,085
Fish spoilage mechanisms and preservation techniques: review
Ghaly (2010) · American Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3844/ajassp.2010.859.877 · Cited by 643
Mirvish, S. S., Wallcave, L., Eagen, M., & Shubik, P. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.177.4043.65 · Cited by 496
Estimating and Addressing America's Food Losses
Kantor, L. S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A., Oliveira, V., Kantor, L. S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A., & Oliveira, V. (1997) · Unknown · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.234453 · Cited by 491 · cited 1×
“Kantor et al. (1997) reported that approximately 3.5 billion kg of poultry and meat were wasted at the consumer, retailer and foodservice levels which have a substantial economic and environmental impact.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Understanding spoilage microbial community and spoilage mechanisms in foods of animal origin
Odeyemi, O. A., Alegbeleye, O. O., Strateva, M., & Stratev, D. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12526 · Cited by 518
Natural antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds for active food packaging applications
Deshmukh, R. K., & Gaikwad, K. K. (2024) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-022-02623-w · Cited by 259
Gao, Y., Zhuang, H., Yeh, H.-Y., Bowker, B., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2019.05.007 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Mutwakil
- Venue
- American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- Science Publications
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 486-510
- ISSN
- 1557-4989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137664020
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meat Spoilage Mechanisms and Preservation Techniques: A Critical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3844/ajabssp.2011.486.510
- The paper
- Mutwakil. (2011). Meat Spoilage Mechanisms and Preservation Techniques: A Critical Review. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2011.486.510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.