Cited by 218Corporate Finance and GovernanceFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceWorking Capital and Financial Performance

TRADE-OFF THEORY VERSUS PECKING ORDER THEORY: CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS IN A PERIPHERAL REGION OF PORTUGAL

Open access
Serrasqueiro, Zélia, Caetano, Ana·2014·Journal of Business Economics and Management

Abstract

This paper seeks to analyse whether the capital structure decisions of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) are closer to the assumptions of Trade-Off Theory or to those of Pecking Order Theory. We use a sample of SMEs located in the interior region of Portugal, using the LSDVC dynamic estimator as method of estimation, the empirical evidence obtained allows us to conclude that the most profitable and oldest SMEs resort less to debt, which corroborates the forecasts of Pecking Order Theory. SMEs, with greater size, resort more to debt, corroborating the forecasts of Trade-Off Theory and Pecking Order Theory. In addition, SMEs adjust noticeably their current level of debt towards the optimal debt ratio, which corroborates what is forecast by Trade-Off Theory. Therefore, this paper enhances that Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories are not mutually exclusive in explaining the capital structure decisions of SMEs. The results suggest that younger and smaller SMEs should be object of public financing support, when the internal financing is clearly insufficient to fund those firms’ activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3846/16111699.2012.744344

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Firms should first operate efficiently to achieve the optimal level of liquidity through WCM.

    “therefore, firms should first operate efficiently to achieve the optimal level of liquidity through WCM (Jahanzeb et al., 2013;Serrasqueiro & Caetano, 2015).”

    From Does the Efficiency of a Firm's Intellectual Capital and Working Capital Management Affect Its Performance? (2024) · cites this paper as Serrasqueiro & Caetano, 2015

    The Introduction and section 3.2 discuss capital structure and SMEs’ adjustment toward an optimal debt ratio, not an optimal level of liquidity. Searches for working capital management, liquidity, and operating efficiency found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 218

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ang, J. 1991. Small business uniqueness & the theory of financial management, Journal of Small Business Finance 1: 1-13.
  2. Sauve, M. Scheuer, H. Friderichs (Eds.). Corporate finance in Germany and France. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank, 140-191.

Authors
Serrasqueiro, Z., & Caetano, A.
Affiliations
University of Beira Interior (PT)
Venue
Journal of Business Economics and Management
Published
2014-12-16
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
445-466
ISSN
  • 1611-1699 (ISSN-L)
  • 2029-4433
OpenAlex
W2078146534
Cited by
218
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
18.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Business Economics and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/EGE-GES/116004/2009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Working Capital and Financial Performance
Keywords
capital structure, trade-off theory, pecking order theory, small and medium-sized enterprises, debt financing, firm age, firm size, optimal debt ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review