The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES FOR ALL KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST: 1284 NEWLY VALIDATED PLANETS AND 428 LIKELY FALSE POSITIVES
Open accessAbstract
We present astrophysical false positive probability calculations for every Kepler Object of Interest (KOI)—the first large-scale demonstration of a fully automated transiting planet validation procedure. Out of 7056 KOIs, we determine that 1935 have probabilities <1% of being astrophysical false positives, and thus may be considered validated planets. Of these, 1284 have not yet been validated or confirmed by other methods. In addition, we identify 428 KOIs that are likely to be false positives, but have not yet been identified as such, though some of these may be a result of unidentified transit timing variations. A side product of these calculations is full stellar property posterior samplings for every host star, modeled as single, binary, and triple systems. These calculations use vespa, a publicly available Python package that is able to be easily applied to any transiting exoplanet candidate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
HABITABLE ZONES AROUND MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: NEW ESTIMATES
Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J. F., Eymet, V., Robinson, T. D., Mahadevan, S., Terrien, R. C., Domagal-Goldman, S., Meadows, V., & Deshpande, R. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/131 · Cited by 1,615 · cited 1×
“…potentially habitable planets, Table 3 lists the properties of 9 CANDIDATE KOIs newly validated by this work that may fall within the optimistic habitable zones of their host stars (Kopparapu et al. 2013), according to the stellar properties reported by the DR24 table at the NExScI Archive.”
BackgroundKepler-22b: A 2.4 EARTH-RADIUS PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A SUN-LIKE STAR
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., Fressin, F., Torres, G., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/120 · Cited by 241
Self-citation
Cited by
Searching the Entirety of Kepler Data. II. Occurrence Rate Estimates for FGK Stars
Kunimoto, M., & Matthews, J. M. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab88b0 · Cited by 139
Eccentric Companions to Kepler-448b and Kepler-693b: Clues to the Formation of Warm Jupiters
Masuda, K. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa7aeb · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Morton, T. D., Bryson, S. T., Coughlin, J. L., Rowe, J. F., Ravichandran, G., Petigura, E. A., Haas, M. R., & Batalha, N. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-05-10
- Volume
- 822
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 86
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2347958330
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.