Making planet nine: Pebble accretion at 250–750 AU in a gravitationally unstable ring
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the formation of icy super-Earth mass planets within a gravitationally unstable ring of solids orbiting at 250–750 AU around a 1 star. Coagulation calculations demonstrate that a system of a few large oligarchs and a swarm of pebbles generates a super-Earth within 100–200 Myr at 250 AU and within 1–2 Gyr at 750 AU. Systems with more than ten oligarchs fail to yield super-Earths over the age of the solar system. As these systems evolve, destructive collisions produce detectable debris disks with luminosities of relative to the central star.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kenyon and Bromley (2016) find that even under exceptionally favorable conditions, formation of super-Earths at hundreds of AU requires billions of years.
“The corresponding impedance of growth by the slowness of the orbital clock is illuminated by the calculations of Kenyon and Bromley (2016), who find that even under exceptionally favorable conditions, formation of super-Earths at hundreds of AU requires billions of years.”
From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Kenyon and Bromley (2016)
Cites
Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System
Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
A Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units
Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13156 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Discovery of a Candidate Inner Oort Cloud Planetoid
Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422095 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. (2004) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/424617 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
A distant planetary-mass solar companion may have produced distant detached objects
GOMES, R., MATESE, J., & LISSAUER, J. (2006) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.026 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
INTERACTION CROSS SECTIONS AND SURVIVAL RATES FOR PROPOSED SOLAR SYSTEM MEMBER PLANET NINE
Li, G., & Adams, F. C. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/l3 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., & Becker, J. C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“The corresponding impedance of growth by the slowness of the orbital clock is illuminated by the calculations of Kenyon and Bromley (2016), who find that even under exceptionally favorable conditions, formation of super-Earths at hundreds of AU requires billions of years.”
MethodOrigin and Evolution of Short-period Comets
Nesvorný, D., Vokrouhlický, D., Dones, L., Levison, H. F., Kaib, N., & Morbidelli, A. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cf6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
New Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects: Toward a Super-Earth in the Outer Solar System
Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/152/6/221 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Consequences of a Distant Massive Planet on the Large Semimajor Axis Trans-Neptunian Objects
Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., Lawler, S. M., Gladman, B. J., & Bannister, M. T. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/63 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Observational Constraints on Planet Nine: Astrometry of Pluto and Other Trans-Neptunian Objects
Holman, M. J., & Payne, M. J. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/80 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Some investigations have argued for closer planets, possibly more than one(Brunini & Melita 2002; Lykawka & Mukai 2008; Bromley & Kenyon 2016; Kenyon & Bromley 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-06-27
- Volume
- 825
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2330743657
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX11AM37G)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- Planet Nine, pebble accretion, oligarchs, debris disks, outer solar system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review