The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HUBBLE IMAGING OF THE IONIZING RADIATION FROM A STAR-FORMING GALAXY AT Z = 3.2 WITH *
Open accessAbstract
Star-forming galaxies are considered to be the leading candidate sources dominating cosmic reionization at : the search for analogs at moderate redshift showing Lyman continuum (LyC) leakage is currently an active line of research. We have observed a star-forming galaxy at z = 3.2 with Hubble/WFC3 in the F336W filter, corresponding to the 730–890 Å rest-frame, and detected LyC emission. This galaxy is very compact and also has a large Oxygen ratio / ( ). No nuclear activity is revealed from optical/near-infrared spectroscopy and deep multi-band photometry (including the 6 Ms X-ray Chandra observations). The measured escape fraction of ionizing radiation spans the range 50%–100%, depending on the intergalactic medium (IGM) attenuation. The LyC emission is measured at (with signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) = 10) and is spatially unresolved, with an effective radius of pc. Predictions from photoionization and radiative transfer models are in line with the properties reported here, indicating that stellar winds and supernova explosions in a nucleated star-forming region can blow cavities generating density-bounded conditions compatible to optically thin media. Irrespective of the nature of the ionizing radiation, spectral signatures of these sources over the entire electromagnetic spectrum are of central importance for their identification during the epoch of reionization when the LyC is unobservable. Intriguingly, the Spitzer/IRAC photometric signature of intense rest-frame optical emissions ([O iii]λλ 4959,5007 + H β) recently observed at is similar to what is observed in this galaxy. Only the James Webb Space Telescope will measure optical line ratios at , allowing a direct comparison with the lower-redshift LyC emitters, such as that reported here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155692 · Cited by 1,736
Cited by
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanzella, E., de Barros, S., Vasei, K., Alavi, A., Giavalisco, M., Siana, B., Grazian, A., Hasinger, G., Suh, H., Cappelluti, N., Vito, F., Amorin, R., Balestra, I., Brusa, M., Calura, F., Castellano, M., Comastri, A., Fontana, A., Gilli, R., Mignoli, M., Pentericci, L., Vignali, C., & Zamorani, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-06-27
- Volume
- 825
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2258610658
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HUBBLE IMAGING OF THE IONIZING RADIATION FROM A STAR-FORMING GALAXY AT Z = 3.2 WITH *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/41
- The paper
- Vanzella, E., de Barros, S., Vasei, K., Alavi, A., Giavalisco, M., Siana, B., Grazian, A., Hasinger, G., Suh, H., Cappelluti, N., Vito, F., Amorin, R., Balestra, I., Brusa, M., Calura, F., Castellano, M., Comastri, A., Fontana, A., Gilli, R., . . . Zamorani, G. (2016). HUBBLE IMAGING OF THE IONIZING RADIATION FROM A STAR-FORMING GALAXY AT Z = 3.2 WITH *. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/41
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.