The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate Empirical Radii and Masses of Planets and Their Host Stars with Gaia Parallaxes
Open accessAbstract
We present empirical measurements of the radii of 116 stars that host transiting planets. These radii are determined using only direct observables—the bolometric flux at Earth, the effective temperature, and the parallax provided by the Gaia first data release—and thus are virtually model independent, with extinction being the only free parameter. We also determine each star’s mass using our newly determined radius and the stellar density, a virtually model independent quantity itself from previously published transit analyses. These stellar radii and masses are in turn used to redetermine the transiting-planet radii and masses, again using only direct observables. The median uncertainties on the stellar radii and masses are 8% and 30%, respectively, and the resulting uncertainties on the planet radii and masses are 9% and 22%, respectively. These accuracies are generally larger than previously published model-dependent precisions of 5% and 6% on the planet radii and masses, respectively, but the newly determined values are purely empirical. We additionally report radii for 242 stars hosting radial-velocity (non-transiting) planets, with a median achieved accuracy of ≈2%. Using our empirical stellar masses we verify that the majority of putative “retired A stars” in the sample are indeed more massive than ∼1.2 . Most importantly, the bolometric fluxes and angular radii reported here for a total of 498 planet host stars—with median accuracies of 1.7% and 1.8%, respectively—serve as a fundamental data set to permit the re-determination of transiting-planet radii and masses with the Gaia second data release to ≈3% and ≈5% accuracy, better than currently published precisions, and determined in an entirely empirical fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126 · cited 1×
“…AV from the three-dimensional Galactic dust model of Amôres & Lépine (2005, Model A) for each star’s line of sight and distance, but we allowed the fit to vary AV from this initial guess by as much as 20%, limited by the maximum lineof-sight extinction from the dust maps of Schlegel et al. (1998).”
MethodThe relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. (1989) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/167900 · Cited by 11,795
The Chemical Composition of the Sun
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 · Cited by 9,346
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Kepler planet-detection mission: Introduction and first results
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T., Caldwell, D., Caldwell, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185402 · Cited by 4,035
Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. (1996) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 · Cited by 3,127
Gaia Data Release 1: Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Mignard, F., Drimmel, R., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Bastian, U., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629512 · Cited by 2,104
Valenti, J. A., & Fischer, D. A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/430500 · Cited by 1,460
Accurate masses and radii of normal stars: modern results and applications
Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Giménez, A. (2010) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1 · Cited by 1,418
Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
Cited by
eleanor: An Open-source Tool for Extracting Light Curves from the TESS Full-frame Images
Feinstein, A. D., Montet, B. T., Foreman-Mackey, D., Bedell, M. E., Saunders, N., Bean, J. L., Christiansen, J. L., Hedges, C., Luger, R., Scolnic, D., et al. (2019) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab291c · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., & Gaudi, B. S.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2017-03-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 136
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2583755487
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate Empirical Radii and Masses of Planets and Their Host Stars with Gaia Parallaxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-3881/aa5df3
- The paper
- Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., & Gaudi, B. S. (2017). Accurate Empirical Radii and Masses of Planets and Their Host Stars with Gaia Parallaxes. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa5df3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.