Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 688

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 211 of the 211 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems

Open access
Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Janka, H.-T., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, Ph., Bozzo, E., Chaty, S., Kruckow, M. U., Heuvel, E. P. J. van den, Antoniadis, J., Breton, R. P., Champion, D. J.·2017·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Double neutron star (DNS) systems represent extreme physical objects and the endpoint of an exotic journey of stellar evolution and binary interactions. Large numbers of DNS systems and their mergers are anticipated to be discovered using the Square Kilometre Array searching for radio pulsars, and the high-frequency gravitational wave detectors (LIGO/VIRGO), respectively. Here we discuss all key properties of DNS systems, as well as selection effects, and combine the latest observational data with new theoretical progress on various physical processes with the aim of advancing our knowledge on their formation. We examine key interactions of their progenitor systems and evaluate their accretion history during the high-mass X-ray binary stage, the common envelope phase, and the subsequent Case BB mass transfer, and argue that the first-formed NSs have accreted at most . We investigate DNS masses, spins, and velocities, and in particular correlations between spin period, orbital period, and eccentricity. Numerous Monte Carlo simulations of the second supernova (SN) events are performed to extrapolate pre-SN stellar properties and probe the explosions. All known close-orbit DNS systems are consistent with ultra-stripped exploding stars. Although their resulting NS kicks are often small, we demonstrate a large spread in kick magnitudes that may, in general, depend on the past interaction history of the exploding star and thus correlate with the NS mass. We analyze and discuss NS kick directions based on our SN simulations. Finally, we discuss the terminal evolution of close-orbit DNS systems until they merge and possibly produce a short γ-ray burst.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89

Cites

211 of 211 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 211 references

Cited by

See all 688

Metadata

Authors
Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Janka, H.-T., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Bozzo, E., Chaty, S., Kruckow, M. U., Heuvel, E. P. J. V. D., Antoniadis, J., Breton, R. P., & Champion, D. J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2017-09-10
Volume
846
Issue
2
Pages
170
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2732921053
Cited by
688
References
211
FWCI
41.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89
The paper
Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P. C. C., Wex, N., Janka, H.-T., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Bozzo, E., Chaty, S., Kruckow, M. U., Heuvel, E. P. J. V. D., Antoniadis, J., Breton, R. P., & Champion, D. J. (2017). Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.