Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The White Dwarf Initial–Final Mass Relation for Progenitor Stars from 0.85 to 7.5 M ⊙

Open access
Cummings, Jeffrey D., Kalirai, Jason S., Tremblay, P.-E., Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico, Choi, Jieun·2018·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present the initial–final mass relation (IFMR) based on the self-consistent analysis of Sirius B and 79 white dwarfs from 13 star clusters. We have also acquired additional signal on eight white dwarfs previously analyzed in the NGC 2099 cluster field, four of which are consistent with membership. These re-observed white dwarfs have masses ranging from 0.72 to 0.97 M ⊙ , with initial masses from 3.0 to 3.65 M ⊙ , where the IFMR has an important change in slope that these new data help to observationally confirm. In total, this directly measured IFMR has small scatter ( σ = 0.06 M ⊙ ) and spans from progenitors of 0.85 to 7.5 M ⊙ . Applying two different stellar evolutionary models to infer two different sets of white dwarf progenitor masses shows that, when the same model is also used to derive the cluster ages, the resulting IFMR has weak sensitivity to the adopted model at all but the highest initial masses (>5.5 M ⊙ ). The nonlinearity of the IFMR is also clearly observed with moderate slopes at lower masses (0.08 M final / M initial ) and higher masses (0.11 M final / M initial ) that are broken up by a steep slope (0.19 M final / M initial ) between progenitors from 2.85 to 3.6 M ⊙ . This IFMR shows total stellar mass loss ranges from 33% of M initial at 0.83 M ⊙ to 83% of M initial at 7.5 M ⊙ . Testing this total mass loss for dependence on progenitor metallicity, however, finds no detectable sensitivity across the moderate range of −0.15 < [Fe/H] < +0.15.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd6

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Metadata

Authors
Cummings, J. D., Kalirai, J. S., Tremblay, P.-E., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Choi, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2018-10-05
Volume
866
Issue
1
Pages
21
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2890898954
Cited by
325
References
58
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The White Dwarf Initial–Final Mass Relation for Progenitor Stars from 0.85 to 7.5 M ⊙. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd6
The paper
Cummings, J. D., Kalirai, J. S., Tremblay, P.-E., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Choi, J. (2018). The White Dwarf Initial–Final Mass Relation for Progenitor Stars from 0.85 to 7.5 M ⊙. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.