Cosmological Simulations of Quasar Fueling to Subparsec Scales Using Lagrangian Hyper-refinement
Open accessAbstract
We present cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of a quasar-mass halo (M halo ≈ 10 12.5 M ⊙ at z = 2) that for the first time resolve gas transport down to the inner 0.1 pc surrounding the central massive black hole. We model a multiphase interstellar medium including stellar feedback by supernovae, stellar winds, and radiation, and a hyper-Lagrangian refinement technique increasing the resolution dynamically approaching the black hole. We do not include black hole feedback. We show that the subpc inflow rate (1) can reach ∼6 M ⊙ yr−1 roughly in steady state during the epoch of peak nuclear gas density (z ∼ 2), sufficient to power a luminous quasar, (2) is highly time variable in the pre-quasar phase, spanning 0.001–10 M ⊙ yr−1 on Myr timescales, and (3) is limited to short (∼2 Myr) active phases (0.01–0.1 M ⊙ yr−1) followed by longer periods of inactivity at lower nuclear gas density and late times (z ∼ 1), owing to the formation of a hot central cavity. Inflowing gas is primarily cool, rotational support dominates over turbulence and thermal pressure, and star formation can consume as much gas as provided by inflows across 1 pc–10 kpc. Gravitational torques from multiscale stellar non-axisymmetries dominate angular momentum transport over gas self-torquing and pressure gradients, with accretion weakly dependent on black hole mass. Subpc inflow rates correlate with nuclear (but decouple from global) star formation and can exceed the Eddington rate by ×10. The black hole can move ∼10 pc from the galaxy center on ∼0.1 Myr. Accreting gas forms pc-scale, rotationally supported, obscuring structures often misaligned with the galaxy-scale disk. These simulations open a new avenue to investigate black hole–galaxy coevolution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even from the galaxy formation point of view, the angular momentum of the gas at about 1 pc from the supermassive black hole can be at about 0°-60° angle with the large-scale gas flows in a galaxy.
“Even from the galaxy formation point of view, the angular momentum of the gas at ∼ 1 pc from the SMBH can be at ∼ 0 ◦ -60 ◦ angle with the large scale ( ∼ kpc) gas flows in a galaxy (Anglés-Alcázar et al. 2021).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Anglés-Alcázar et al. 2021
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · see citing works
Yuan, F., Bu, D., & Wu, M. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/130 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Even from the galaxy formation point of view, the angular momentum of the gas at ∼ 1 pc from the SMBH can be at ∼ 0 ◦ − 60 ◦ angle with the large scale ( ∼ kpc) gas flows in a galaxy (Anglés-Alcázar et al. 2021).”
BackgroundWhat drives the growth of black holes: A decade of progress
Alexander, D. M., Hickox, R. C., Aird, J., Combes, F., Costa, T., Habouzit, M., Harrison, C. M., Leng, R. I., Morabito, L. K., Uckelman, S. L., et al. (2025) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anglés-Alcázar, D., Quataert, E., Hopkins, P. F., Somerville, R. S., Hayward, C. C., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Bryan, G. L., Kereš, D., Hernquist, L., & Stone, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Flatiron Institute (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2021-08-01
- Volume
- 917
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 53
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W3081721810
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- quasar fueling, nuclear star formation, stellar feedback, angular momentum transport, black hole-galaxy coevolution, quasar outflows, Eddington ratio, high-redshift quasars, multiphase interstellar medium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review