Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet–Disk Interactions Interpretation

Open access
Zhang, Shangjia, Zhu, Zhaohuan, Huang, Jane, Guzmán, Viviana V., Andrews, Sean M., Birnstiel, Tilman, Dullemond, Cornelis P., Carpenter, John M., Isella, Andrea, Pérez, Laura M., Benisty, Myriam, Wilner, David J., Baruteau, Clément, Bai, Xue-Ning, Ricci, Luca·2018·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP) provides a large sample of protoplanetary disks with substructures that could be induced by young forming planets. To explore the properties of planets that may be responsible for these substructures, we systematically carry out a grid of 2D hydrodynamical simulations, including both gas and dust components. We present the resulting gas structures, including the relationship between the planet mass, as well as (1) the gaseous gap depth/width and (2) the sub/super-Keplerian motion across the gap. We then compute dust continuum intensity maps at the frequency of the DSHARP observations. We provide the relationship between the planet mass, as well as (1) the depth/width of the gaps at millimeter intensity maps, (2) the gap edge ellipticity and asymmetry, and (3) the position of secondary gaps induced by the planet. With these relationships, we lay out the procedure to constrain the planet mass using gap properties, and study the potential planets in the DSHARP disks. We highlight the excellent agreement between observations and simulations for AS 209 and the detectability of the young solar system analog. Finally, under the assumption that the detected gaps are induced by young planets, we characterize the young planet population in the planet mass–semimajor axis diagram. We find that the occurrence rate for >5 M J planets beyond 5–10 au is consistent with direct imaging constraints. Disk substructures allow us to probe a wide-orbit planet population (Neptune to Jupiter mass planets beyond 10 au) that is not accessible to other planet searching techniques.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf744

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S., Zhu, Z., Huang, J., Guzmán, V. V., Andrews, S. M., Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., Carpenter, J. M., Isella, A., Pérez, L. M., Benisty, M., Wilner, D. J., Baruteau, C., Bai, X.-N., & Ricci, L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2018-12-20
Volume
869
Issue
2
Pages
L47
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2905495549
Cited by
389
References
86
FWCI
24.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet–Disk Interactions Interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/2041-8213/aaf744
The paper
Zhang, S., Zhu, Z., Huang, J., Guzmán, V. V., Andrews, S. M., Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., Carpenter, J. M., Isella, A., Pérez, L. M., Benisty, M., Wilner, D. J., Baruteau, C., Bai, X.-N., & Ricci, L. (2018). The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet–Disk Interactions Interpretation. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaf744

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.