Cited by 123Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

Ab Initio Horizon-scale Simulations of Magnetically Arrested Accretion in Sagittarius A* Fed by Stellar Winds

Open access
Ressler, Sean M., White, Christopher J., Quataert, Eliot, Stone, James M.·2020·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

We present 3D general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations of the accretion flow surrounding Sagittarius A* that are initialized using larger-scale MHD simulations of the ∼30 Wolf–Rayet (WR) stellar winds in the Galactic center. The properties of the resulting accretion flow on horizon scales are set not by ad hoc initial conditions but by the observationally constrained properties of the WR winds with limited free parameters. For this initial study we assume a non-spinning black hole. Our simulations naturally produce a ∼10 −8 M ⊙ yr −1 accretion rate, consistent with previous phenomenological estimates. We find that a magnetically arrested flow is formed by the continuous accretion of coherent magnetic field being fed from large radii. Near the event horizon, the magnetic field is so strong that it tilts the gas with respect to the initial angular momentum and concentrates the originally quasi-spherical flow to a narrow disk-like structure. We also present 230 GHz images calculated from our simulations where the inclination angle and physical accretion rate are not free parameters but are determined by the properties of the WR stellar winds. The image morphology is highly time variable. Linear polarization on horizon scales is coherent with weak internal Faraday rotation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9532

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This accretion rate is consistent with the accretion of stellar wind material from nearby Wolf-Rayet stars.

    “This accretion rate is found to be consistent with the accretion of stellar wind material from nearby Wolf-Rayet stars (Loeb 2004; Mo´ scibrodzka et al. 2006; Ressler et al. 2020).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ressler et al. 2020

  • Such highly magnetized accretion flow produces jets/outflows that restrict the final accretion to the black hole to only ~10^-8 M⊙/yr.

    “Such highly magnetized accretion flow produces jets / outflows that restrict the final accretion to the black hole to only ∼ 10 -8 M ⊙ yr -1 (Ressler et al. 2020, 2023).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ressler et al. 2020

  • More sophisticated numerical simulations employing GRMHD also agree on the estimated accretion rates from the simpler accretion flow models.

    “More sophisticated numerical simulations employing state-of-the-art methods for solving the General Relativistic Magneto-Hydrodynamics (GRMHD) equations also agree on the estimated accretion rates from the simpler accretion flow models (Dexter et al. 2009; Drappeau et al. 2013; Ressler et al. 2020, 2023).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ressler et al. 2020

  • Multi-scale simulations covering the whole range ≈1 rg to 6×10^6 rg suggest that even though the wind feeds the SMBH at a higher rate (at ~10^6 rg scale), the accreted material close to the black hole quickly becomes 'magnetically arrested' and gas accretion to the black hole happens only via a thin disk.

    “Multi-scale simulations covering the whole range of ≈ 1 rg to 6 × 10 6 rg suggest that even though the wind feeds the SMBH at a higher rate (at ∼ 10 6 rg scale), the accreted material close to the black hole quickly becomes 'magnetically arrested' and gas accretion to the black hole happens only via a thin disk.”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Ressler et al. 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ressler, S. M., White, C. J., Quataert, E., & Stone, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
896
Issue
1
Pages
L6
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W3029747515
Cited by
123
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF7392)
  • NSF (NSF PHY-1748958, AST-1715054, AST-1715277)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
Sgr A*, Galactic Center, black hole accretion, general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, accretion disk formation, magnetic field configuration, linear polarization, Faraday rotation, accretion rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review