Cited by 17Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Sodium distribution on the Moon

Open access
Narendranath, S., Pillai, Netra S., Tadepalli, Srikar P., Sarantos, Menelaos, Vadodariya, K., Sarwade, A., V, Radhakrishna, Tyagi, A.·2022·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

Abstract The Moon is significantly depleted in volatile elements when compared to Earth, an observation that has resulted in various formation scenarios leading to the loss of volatiles. Sodium is a moderately volatile element that is a lithophile, which can be utilized as a tracer of the volatile history in planetary bodies. It is also well observed in the exosphere of several bodies in our solar system and exoplanetary systems. But lunar surface sodium abundances have so far been measured only in samples brought back to Earth. We report on results from the first effort to provide a global-scale measurement of sodium on the lunar surface using X-ray fluorescent spectra from Chandrayaan-2. A global average of 1.33 ± 0.03 wt% derived here is higher than previously known. Trends in the sodium abundance indicate a long-lived adsorbate component that could explain the higher abundances reported here, which would act as a reservoir that sustains the lunar sodium exosphere.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8213/ac905a

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narendranath et al. derived a global average sodium distribution on the Lunar surface of 1.33 ± 0.03 wt%.

    “Narendranath et al. mapped the sodium distribution on the Lunar surface for the first time and derived a global average of 1.33 ± 0.03 wt% [353].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Merkel, A. W., Vervack, R. J., Jr+, Killen, R. M., et al. 2018, GeoRL, 45, 6790 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narendranath, S., Pillai, N. S., Tadepalli, S. P., Sarantos, M., Vadodariya, K., Sarwade, A., V, R., & Tyagi, A.
Affiliations
  • Indian Space Research Organisation (IN)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2022-09-26
Volume
937
Issue
2
Pages
L23
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W4297359672
Cited by
17
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
lunar surface composition, volatile depletion, lunar exosphere, X-ray fluorescence, Chandrayaan-2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review