Tidal Disruption Event Demographics with the Zwicky Transient Facility: Volumetric Rates, Luminosity Function, and Implications for the Local Black Hole Mass Function
Open accessAbstract
We conduct a systematic tidal disruption event (TDE) demographics analysis using the largest sample of optically selected TDEs. A flux-limited, spectroscopically complete sample of 33 TDEs is constructed using the Zwicky Transient Facility over 3 yr (from 2018 October to 2021 September). We infer the black hole (BH) mass ( M BH ) with host galaxy scaling relations, showing that the sample M BH ranges from 10 5.1 M ⊙ to 10 8.2 M ⊙ . We developed a survey efficiency corrected maximum volume method to infer the rates. The rest-frame g -band luminosity function can be well described by a broken power law of ϕ ( L g ) ∝ L g / L bk 0.3 + L g / L bk 2.6 − 1 , with L bk = 10 43.1 erg s −1 . In the BH mass regime of 10 5.3 ≲ ( M BH / M ⊙ ) ≲ 10 7.3 , the TDE mass function follows ϕ ( M BH ) ∝ M BH − 0.25 , which favors a flat local BH mass function ( dn BH / d log M BH ≈ constant ). We confirm the significant rate suppression at the high-mass end ( M BH ≳ 10 7.5 M ⊙ ), which is consistent with theoretical predictions considering direct capture of hydrogen-burning stars by the event horizon. At a host galaxy mass of M gal ∼ 10 10 M ⊙ , the average optical TDE rate is ≈3.2 × 10 −5 galaxy −1 yr −1 . We constrain the optical TDE rate to be [3.7, 7.4, and 1.6] × 10 −5 galaxy −1 yr −1 in galaxies with red, green, and blue colors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed rate of TDEs in the local universe is ∼1-6e-5 yr^-1 galaxy^-1.
“Although the observed rate of TDEs in the local universe is ∼ 1 -6 × 10 -5 yr -1 galaxy -1 (Donley et al. 2002; Gezari et al. 2008; Yao et al. 2023), the expected rate for MW type SMBH is ∼ 0 . 3 -4 × 10 -4 yr -1 galaxy -1 (Magorrian & Tremaine 1999; Wang & Merritt 2004; Gezari et al. 2008; Stone & Metzger 2016).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Yao et al. 2023
Cites
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating Distance from Parallaxes. IV. Distances to 1.33 Billion Stars in Gaia Data Release 2
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Although the observed rate of TDEs in the local universe is ∼ 1 − 6 × 10 − 5 yr − 1 galaxy − 1 (Donley et al. 2002; Gezari et al. 2008; Yao et al. 2023), the expected rate for MW type SMBH is ∼ 0 .”
Background
- Authors
- Yao, Y., Ravi, V., Gezari, S., van Velzen, S., Lu, W., Schulze, S., Somalwar, J. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Hammerstein, E., Nicholl, M., Graham, M. J., Perley, D. A., Cenko, S. B., Stein, R., Ricarte, A., Chadayammuri, U., Quataert, E., Bellm, E. C., Bloom, J. S., Dekany, R., Drake, A. J., Groom, S. L., Mahabal, A. A., Prince, T. A., Riddle, R., Rusholme, B., Sharma, Y., Sollerman, J., & Yan, L.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yao, Yuhan
- ORCID
- Yao, Yuhan
- Ravi, Vikram
- Gezari, Suvi
- van Velzen, Sjoert
- Lu, Wenbin
- Schulze, Steve
- Somalwar, Jean J.
- Kulkarni, S. R.
- Hammerstein, Erica
- Nicholl, Matt
- Graham, Matthew J.
- Perley, Daniel A.
- Cenko, S. Bradley
- Stein, Robert
- Ricarte, Angelo
- Chadayammuri, Urmila
- Quataert, Eliot
- Bellm, Eric C.
- Bloom, Joshua S.
- Dekany, Richard
- Drake, Andrew J.
- Groom, Steven L.
- Mahabal, Ashish A.
- Prince, Thomas A.
- Riddle, Reed
- Rusholme, Ben
- Sharma, Yashvi
- Sollerman, Jesper
- Yan, Lin
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2023-09-01
- Volume
- 955
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L6
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W4386762080
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 25.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Heising-Simons Foundation (12540303)
- National Science Foundation (AST-1440341, AST-2034437)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF5076)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- tidal disruption, black hole mass function, Zwicky Transient Facility, TDE rate, black hole mass estimation, volume-limited sample, massive black holes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review