Cited by 5Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Discovery of Jupiter Family Comet 2011 UG104 Through AI Enhanced Citizen Science

Open access
DeSpain, Jarod A., Chandler, Colin Orion, Sedaghat, Nima, Oldroyd, William J., Trujillo, Chadwick A., Burris, William A., Hsieh, Henry H., Kueny, Jay K. +12 more·2024·Research Notes of the AAS

Abstract

Abstract We report the discovery of cometary activity from minor planet 2011 UG104, which we classify as a Jupiter Family Comet (JFC). This discovery was aided by our Artificial Intelligence (AI) classification system: TailNet. JFC's, short-period comets with eccentric Jupiter-crossing orbits, originate from the Kuiper Belt and thus give us unique insight into the composition and distribution of volatiles in the outer solar system, past and present. Our AI assistant TailNet first classified 2011 UG104 as active, which was affirmed by Citizen Scientists on our NASA Partner Program Active Asteroids. Through further archival image searches our science team found evidence of activity on 2011 UG104 on three separate observations from 2021 February to 2021 April (81.°8 < f < 95.°0).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2515-5172/ad4d9c

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common way of integrating AI in citizen science is by having participants train algorithms.

    “Among citizen science projects, the most common way of integrating AI is by having participants train algorithms (Chandler et al., 2025;DeSpain et al., 2024;Duerinckx et al., 2024, p. 3;Jia et al., 2025;See et al., 2025).”

    From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as DeSpain et al., 2024

    The Methods section describes volunteers classifying images and TailNet assisting the screening process. It does not say that participants train TailNet or other algorithms, or compare how commonly AI is integrated across citizen science projects. Searches for algorithm training and the claimed ‘most common’ approach found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeSpain, J. A., Chandler, C. O., Sedaghat, N., Oldroyd, W. J., Trujillo, C. A., Burris, W. A., Hsieh, H. H., Kueny, J. K., Farrell, K. A., Magbanua, M. J. M., Sheppard, S. S., Mazzucato, M. T., Bosch, M. K. D., Shaw-Diaz, T., Gonano, V., Lamperti, A., da Silva Campos, J. A., Goodwin, B. L., Terentev, I. A., & Dukes, C. J. A.
Affiliations
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Planetary Science Institute (US)
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • Royal Astronomical Society (GB)
Venue
Research Notes of the AAS
Published
2024-05-22
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
140
ISSN
2515-5172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398201386
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Research Notes of the AAS (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC19K0869, 80NSSC21K0114)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Jupiter-family comets, cometary activity, minor planet, artificial intelligence classification, citizen science, active asteroids, Kuiper belt, short-period comets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review