The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties
Open accessAbstract
Species of the anamorph genus Phoma are commonly isolated from a wide range of ecological niches. They are notoriously difficult to identify due to the paucity of morphological features and the plasticity of these when cultivated on agar media. Species linked to Phoma section Peyronellaea are typified by the production of dictyochlamydospores and thus have additional characters to use in taxon delineation. However, the taxonomy of this section is still not fully understood. Furthermore the production of such chlamydospores also is known in some other sections of Phoma. DNA sequences were generated from three loci, namely ITS, actin, and 3-tubulin, to clarify the phylogeny of Phoma taxa that produce dictyochlamydospores. Results were unable to support section Peyronellaea as a taxonomic entity. Dictyochlamydospore formation appears to be a feature that developed, or was lost, many times during the evolution of Phoma. Furthermore, based on the multigene analyses, five new Phoma species could be delineated while a further five required taxonomic revision to be consistent with the genetic variation observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference
Shimodaira, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 · Cited by 4,237
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Stielow, J. B., Lévesque, C. A., Seifert, K. A., Meyer, W., Irinyi, L., Smits, D., Renfurm, R., Verkley, G. J. M., Groenewald, M., Chaduli, D., et al. (2015) · Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi · doi:10.3767/003158515x689135 · Cited by 567
Self-citationRedisposition of phoma-like anamorphs in Pleosporales
de Gruyter, J., Woudenberg, J. H. C., Aveskamp, M. M., Verkley, G. J. M., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W. (2013) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim0004 · Cited by 356
Self-citationWijayawardene, N. N., Hyde, K. D., Rajeshkumar, K. C., Hawksworth, D. L., Madrid, H., Kirk, P. M., Braun, U., Singh, R. V., Crous, P. W., Kukwa, M., et al. (2017) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-017-0386-0 · Cited by 331
Self-citationSystematic reappraisal of species in Phoma section Paraphoma , Pyrenochaeta and Pleurophoma
de Gruyter, J., Woudenberg, J. H. C., Aveskamp, M. M., Verkley, G. J. M., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W. (2010) · Mycologia · doi:10.3852/09-240 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Aveskamp, M. M., Verkley, G. J. M., de Gruyter, J., Murace, M. A., Perelló, A., Woudenberg, J. H. C., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W.
- Venue
- Mycologia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-382
- ISSN
- 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-2536
- OpenAlex
- W2096517252
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3852/08-199
- The paper
- Aveskamp, M. M., Verkley, G. J. M., de Gruyter, J., Murace, M. A., Perelló, A., Woudenberg, J. H. C., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W. (2009). DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.3852/08-199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
