The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data: Archival Version
Open accessAbstract
These data make it possible to replicate all numerical results in Gary King (1997), A SOLUTION TO THE ECOLOGICAL INFERENCE PROBLEM: RECONSTRUCTING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR FROM AGGREGATE DATA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa
Posner, D. N. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808661 · Cited by 1,113
Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method
Snyder, R. (2001) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/bf02687586 · Cited by 1,002
Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research
Geys, B. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002 · Cited by 860
Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide
Kievit, R. A., Frankenhuis, W. E., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513 · Cited by 542
Revisiting Robinson: The perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy
Subramanian, S. V., Jones, K., Kaddour, A., & Krieger, N. (2009) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyn359 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- King, G.
- Venue
- ICPSR Data Holdings
- Published
- 1997-05-16
- OpenAlex
- W4205465679
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data: Archival Version. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3886/icpsr01132
- The paper
- King, G. (1997). Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data: Archival Version. ICPSR Data Holdings. https://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr01132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
