The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross Polity Survey, 1963: Version 1
Open accessAbstract
Data for 115 polities is contained in this study. Each polity has nominal and ordinal data on 59 "raw characteristics" and 194 "finished characteristics." The raw characteristics include economic-demographic indicators and more subjective measures such as degree of political modernization and interest articulation. The finished characteristics are dichotomous variables which contrast groups of polities in various ways. Each polity is classified on one side or another of each dichotomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300555475 · Cited by 7,484
Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps
Bollen, K. A. (1990) · Studies In Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/bf02716903 · Cited by 441
Democratization and Research Methods
Coppedge, M. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139016179 · Cited by 303
Formation and Success of New Parties: A Cross-National Analysis
Harmel, R., & Robertson, J. D. (1985) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/019251218500600408 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Banks, A. S., & Textor, R. B.
- Venue
- ICPSR Data Holdings
- Published
- 1984-05-10
- OpenAlex
- W2313807667
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross Polity Survey, 1963: Version 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3886/icpsr05004.v1
- The paper
- Banks, A. S., & Textor, R. B. (1984). Cross Polity Survey, 1963: Version 1. ICPSR Data Holdings. https://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr05004.v1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
