The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A NEW FLUOROMETRIC ASSAY FOR CYTOTOXICITY MEASUREMENTS IN-VITRO
Abstract
Cytotoxicity testing of anticancer drugs requires techniques which are sensitive, reproducible and applicable to large scale testing using automated instruments. These assays are presently performed with end point staining of cell proteins with dyes, viability stains or energy dependent of substrates such as MTT or XTT. Although reliable. these assays are not sensitive enough, too expensive for large scale screening or they use reagents that may be harmful for personnel or equipment. We describe, the use of Alamar Blue, a new non fluorescent substrate, which after reduction in living cells, yields a very strong fluorescent product. Using the automated fluorescence plate reader Cytofluor, we have evaluated the various parameters such as substrate concentration, time and volume of incubation with respect to linearity and lower limit of detection. We found that for a two hour assay, this new non toxic substrate could detect as low as 200 cells per well with a useful measurement range up to 20,000 cells per well. The fluorescent assay is more than ten times as sensitive as the colorimetric assay. When the cytotoxicity of daunorubicin was measured with this assay and compared to the XTT formazan assay we found comparable IC50 values but this new assay was more economical and results are obtained in two hours as compared to four hours for the formazan assay. This new economical and versatile assay could be used with advantage for large scale in vitro screening of anticancer drugs and other cytotoxic agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O'Brien, J., Wilson, I., Orton, T., & Pognan, F. (2000) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x · Cited by 3,446
Kohsaka, S., Nagano, M., Ueno, T., Suehara, Y., Hayashi, T., Shimada, N., Takahashi, K., Suzuki, K., Takamochi, K., Takahashi, F., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aan6566 · Cited by 210
Tõugu, V., Karafin, A., Zovo, K., Chung, R. S., Howells, C., West, A. K., & Palumaa, P. (2009) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06269.x · Cited by 181
Constantinou, A., Gunz, D., Evans, E., Lalle, P., Bates, P. A., Wood, R. D., & Clarkson, S. G. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.9.5637 · Cited by 119
Palomino, J. C., & Portaels, F. (1999) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/pl00015025 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- PAGE, B., PAGE, M., & NOEL, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Oncology
- Publisher
- Spandidos Publications
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 473-6
- ISSN
- 1019-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 1791-2423
- OpenAlex
- W2019164724
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A NEW FLUOROMETRIC ASSAY FOR CYTOTOXICITY MEASUREMENTS IN-VITRO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3892/ijo.3.3.473
- The paper
- PAGE, B., PAGE, M., & NOEL, C. (1993). A NEW FLUOROMETRIC ASSAY FOR CYTOTOXICITY MEASUREMENTS IN-VITRO. International Journal of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.3.3.473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.