An effective range of polydeoxyribonucleotides is critical for wound healing quality
Open accessAbstract
Wound healing is a physiological restorative response to tissue and cell injury. This process occurs in collaboration with a complex cascade of cellular events, including biochemical alterations to the extracellular matrix. Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) is a fragmented DNA mixture from Oncorhynchus mykiss or Oncorhynchus keta sperm known to promote tissue regeneration under different pathophysiological conditions. However, the most effective molecular size of PDRNs for promoting the wound healing process and quality has not been established. In the present study, the regeneration quality with low (<50 kDa), middle [classic PDRN; 50‑1,500 kDa] and high (>1,500 kDa) molecular weight PDRNs in a skin wound healing mouse model was examined using hematoxylin and eosin, as well as Masson's trichrome stain. A 4 mm biopsy punch was used to produce wounds in the skin of the mice. PDRN‑mediated cellular behavior and signaling were evaluated by in vitro scratch assay and western blot analysis, respectively. It was observed that the apparent surface wound healing processes were not significantly different between PDRN molecular sizes. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that classic PDRN‑injected mice exhibited less lipid accumulation with increased collagen composition. These results suggested that 50‑1,500 kDa PDRN offers an effective DNA mixture to improve wound healing quality. Furthermore, classic PDRN increased cell migration via c‑Jun N‑terminal kinase signaling in human fibroblasts. The present study suggests an optimal PDRN molecular weight to promote wound healing, and novel approaches for therapeutic strategies to improve tissue regeneration quality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Upon enzymatic degradation, PDRN yields a pool of bioavailable nucleosides and nucleotides that can be rapidly reincorporated into cellular processes, promoting tissue regeneration and accelerating wound healing.
“Upon enzymatic degradation, PDRN yields a pool of bioavailable nucleosides and nucleotides that can be rapidly reincorporated into cellular processes, thereby promoting tissue regeneration and accelerating wound healing [50,75,76,77].”
From Comparison of Polynucleotide and Polydeoxyribonucleotide in Dermatology: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [77]
The Introduction says PDRN products may contain deoxynucleosides and deoxynucleotides, and the Discussion reports improved wound-regeneration quality with PDRN. Neither passage says these components arise through enzymatic degradation or are rapidly reincorporated into cellular processes; the paper instead links its observed healing effect to cell migration. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNo standardized criteria have been established to delineate molecular weight thresholds that clearly distinguish PN from PDRN.
“To date, no standardized criteria have been established to delineate molecular weight thresholds that clearly distinguish PN from PDRN, despite considerable variation among previously proposed classifications [11,20,77,143].”
From Comparison of Polynucleotide and Polydeoxyribonucleotide in Dermatology: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [77]
The Introduction defines classic PDRN as 50–1,500 kDa, and the Discussion compares differently sized PDRNs. Neither section addresses PN or whether standardized molecular-weight criteria distinguish PN from PDRN (searched: PN, classification, standardization, and molecular-weight thresholds). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Colangelo, M. T., Galli, C., & Guizzardi, S. (2020) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/rme-2019-0118 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kim, S. T. (2025) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17081024 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hwang, K., Kim, J., Park, E., & Cha, S.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Venue
- Molecular Medicine Reports
- Publisher
- Spandidos Publications
- Published
- 2018-10-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5166-5172
- ISSN
- 1791-2997 (ISSN-L)
- 1791-3004
- OpenAlex
- W2895460976
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Medicine Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2015R1D1A1A01060454, 2017R1D1A3B03031760, 2017R1A5A2015369)
- PharmaResearch Products
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Keywords
- polydeoxyribonucleotide, wound healing, molecular weight, tissue regeneration, collagen, extracellular matrix, fibroblast migration, JNK signaling, skin wounds, lipid accumulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Collagen, Disease Models, Animal, Fibroblasts, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Polydeoxyribonucleotides, Skin, Wound Healing, Biomarkers, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review